Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages in c.k.o ?
I didn't. But since you say that there is a reason for them to be in "testing", I then assumed the reason was "testing". But then, the activity usually called "testing" is part of a process usually called Quality Assurance.
But hey, maybe I am way to stupid to match your geniality!
Also, why are you ignoring what has already been said to you about the repo and the target audience its aimed at ?
*What* exactly has been said and by whom? I only saw you inferring what it's *not* aimed at: people who don't like things in "testing".
As I said, and as everyone on this list knows: KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would throw offensive assertion to people. No matter what KB would say, and no matter how important is KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through the centos ML archives would show that KB is not someone easy to deal with.
Probably I should stop posting to this list. I only mentioned KB's repo in the context of packages staying in "testing" for years.
R-C
__________________________________________________________________ Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/
----- Original Message ----
From: Radu-Cristian FOTESCU beranger5ca@yahoo.ca To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:59:42 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
Where did you see the QA requirements for the packages in c.k.o ?
I didn't. But since you say that there is a reason for them to be in "testing", I then assumed the reason was "testing". But then, the activity usually called "testing" is part of a process usually called Quality Assurance.
But hey, maybe I am way to stupid to match your geniality!
Also, why are you ignoring what has already been said to you about the repo and the target audience its aimed at ?
*What* exactly has been said and by whom? I only saw you inferring what it's *not* aimed at: people who don't like things in "testing".
As I said, and as everyone on this list knows: KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would throw offensive assertion to people. No matter what KB would say, and no matter how important is KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through the centos ML archives would show that KB is not someone easy to deal with.
Probably I should stop posting to this list. I only mentioned KB's repo in the context of packages staying in "testing" for years.
R-C
I Can not speak for others, but the only time i have seen Karanbir be stern with anyone is when they do deserve it. I like the way he will point you to the right place without dancing around. I have no idea what your deal is though with going after anyone and everybody. Do you just love attacking people in gerernal?
my 1/2 cent opinion!
Steven
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
As I said, and as everyone on this list knows: KB is not a person to talk with. Usually, KB would throw offensive assertion to people. No matter what KB would say, and no matter how important is KB to the CentOS project, a quick search through the centos ML archives would show that KB is not someone easy to deal with.
Not been my personal experience.
-
Michael A. Peters -
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU -
Steven Vishoot