Francis Gerund wrote: <snip>
And FWIW, I do like, and use the CLI all the time. That's how I learned
- using MS-DOS 3.2 on a 386sx box with 360k floppy drives. And 512k ram - what luxury!
: )
You leaned on a 386 with (2?) floppy drives? I had to make do with DOS 3.0 on an 8088 w/ 2 floppy drives... and let me tell you how much fun it was to compile (I kid you not) basica, esp. with an encrypted library....
mark
Upon reflection, recall that first "real" computer actually had 8088 processor (8-bit deliberately crippled version of 16-bit 8086 processor). Second one was the 386sx (16 bit deliberated-crippled version of 32-bit 386 processor).
Unless you count the Timex-Sinclair 1000 (z80 processor, i/o from cassette tape storage) .
Before that, at university:
- IBM 370 series mainframe, in locked room, inaccessible to mere mortals.
- programs entered on punch cards using key-punch machine, submitted through small window in computer room.
- come back for dot-matrix printout of results Thursday.
- edit program for errors, until assignment deadline passes.
- rinse, lather, repeat. What fun.
Is this thread getting to be [OT]?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Francis Gerund wrote:
<snip> > And FWIW, I do like, and use the CLI all the time. That's how I learned - using MS-DOS 3.2 on a 386sx box with 360k floppy drives. And 512k ram - what luxury! > > : )
You leaned on a 386 with (2?) floppy drives? I had to make do with DOS 3.0 on an 8088 w/ 2 floppy drives... and let me tell you how much fun it was to compile (I kid you not) basica, esp. with an encrypted library....
mark
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos