Johnny (& other CentOS folks), Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the centos mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for CentOS 5.9 updates not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?
I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos servers was updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message going out, unless I also see a message from one of the admins indicating an issue, so I am very confused.
Thanks for the feedback.
repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08 CESA-2013:0898 mesa email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 03-Jun-2013 22:45 CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 06-Jun-2013 14:55
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D [3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019773.html [4] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019779.html
Even when this disclaimer is not here: I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the terms of any contract.
On 06/11/2013 11:07 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
Johnny (& other CentOS folks), Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the centos mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for CentOS 5.9 updates not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?
I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos servers was updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message going out, unless I also see a message from one of the admins indicating an issue, so I am very confused.
Thanks for the feedback.
repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08 CESA-2013:0898 mesa email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 03-Jun-2013 22:45 CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2] 06-Jun-2013 14:55
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D [3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019773.html [4] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-June/019779.html
I have just pushed a metadata update to clear out any possible issues as it was easy to do and should make all the mirrors update, etc.
Should be on all mirror.centos.org in 30 minutes.
-----Original Message----- From: Johnny Hughes [mailto:johnny@centos.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:16 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] CESA-2013:0898 & CEBA-2013:0902,centos 5.9 repodata not pushed?
On 06/11/2013 11:07 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
Johnny (& other CentOS folks), Am I being fooled by some proxies between me and centos (and all the
centos mirrors, which what I normally use), or has the repodata for CentOS 5.9 updates not been updated since 03-Jun-2013 12:08?
I was under the impression that the repodata on the main centos
servers was updated about the same time as any CentOS-announce message going out, unless I also see a message from one of the admins indicating an issue, so I am very confused.
Thanks for the feedback.
repodata[1] 03-Jun-2013 12:08 CESA-2013:0898 mesa email[3] Jun 3 22:45:12 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
03-Jun-2013 22:45
CEBA-2013:0902 gfs2-utils email[4] Jun 6 14:55:49 UTC 2013, rpm[2]
06-Jun-2013 14:55
[1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/repodata/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.9/updates/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=D [3] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-
June/019773.html
June/019779.html
I have just pushed a metadata update to clear out any possible issues as it was easy to do and should make all the mirrors update, etc.
Should be on all mirror.centos.org in 30 minutes.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Even when this disclaimer is not here: I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the terms of any contract.
-
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane -
Johnny Hughes