Cant find this version. Can some point me in the right direction.
_____________________________________ "He's no failure. He's not dead yet." William Lloyd George
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:29 -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
Cant find this version. Can some point me in the right direction.
I suppose that the valid reason you'll invoke is 'i have a driver disk built for rhel4u4 and then i really need CentOS 4.4' ... Ok, here it is : http://vault.centos.org
But don't forget that on the first `yum update` you'll automatically jump to 4.5 ...
Thanks! BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
Thanks for the heads up on the yum.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Fabian Arrotin Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:40 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] i cant find centos 4.4
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:29 -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
Cant find this version. Can some point me in the right direction.
I suppose that the valid reason you'll invoke is 'i have a driver disk built for rhel4u4 and then i really need CentOS 4.4' ... Ok, here it is : http://vault.centos.org
But don't forget that on the first `yum update` you'll automatically jump to 4.5 ...
On 9/18/07, Blackburn, Marvin mblackburn@glenraven.com wrote:
Thanks! BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
You might remind your developer about security updates. RHEL 4.4 is no longer supported by RH as update 5 is current. It's RHEL 4, plus updates all updates to this point.
You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle. However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:52 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] i cant find centos 4.4
On 9/18/07, Blackburn, Marvin mblackburn@glenraven.com wrote:
Thanks! BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
You might remind your developer about security updates. RHEL 4.4 is no longer supported by RH as update 5 is current. It's RHEL 4, plus updates all updates to this point.
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:58 -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle. However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
<snip>
You might remind your developer about security updates. RHEL 4.4 is no longer supported by RH as update 5 is current. It's RHEL 4, plus updates all updates to this point.
As noted by Jim , RH still support version 4, but with updates applied to u5 so 4.5 ...
Blackburn, Marvin spake the following on 9/18/2007 1:58 PM:
You have a very valid point about security. It's a constant battle. However, RH still does support all versions of 4.
There is no "all versions of 4". There is just 4. The rest is just the point in time at which they spin the updates into new CD images.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:46:11PM -0400, Blackburn, Marvin wrote:
BUt the real reason is that the developer wants the environment to be as close as possible to the rhel 4.4.
If possible, that developer needs to be stopped. Although RHEL 5 is apparently going to work that way, there is no such thing as RHEL 4.4 -- only RHEL 4 update 4, which is *supplanted* by update 5.