Been a week, any eta? :)
Thanks!
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 13:08 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Matthew Kent wrote:
Been a week, any eta? :)
Thanks!
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Ah of course, sounds great.
Happy to wait for 5.2.
On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel include the NFS patch (RH bug 321111 I think)? The only reason I am using the centosplus kernel is because of the NFS performance issue. Oh, and I also like to have framebuffer support in the kernel which was missing from the previous centosplus kernel. So if the 5.2 kernel includes the NFS patch, and has FB support, that would make my day!
Alfred :-)
Alfred von Campe wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel include the NFS patch (RH bug 321111 I think)? The only reason I am using the centosplus kernel is because of the NFS performance issue. Oh, and I also like to have framebuffer support in the kernel which was missing from the previous centosplus kernel. So if the 5.2 kernel includes the NFS patch, and has FB support, that would make my day!
yes ... the new kernel is fixed upstream for that issue
-
Alfred von Campe -
Johnny Hughes -
Matthew Kent