I asked about 18 months ago if gallery2 was available in any of the CentOS repositories, and it seemed that at that time it was not. However, there was some talk of putting it in epel or epel-testing. But I looked just now, and did not find it there.
I actually installed gallery2 on my server by following the instructions at http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Preinstaller. But I've had a slight http problem on the server which might be related to gallery2 (wireshark seemed to show some odd calls on gallery2); so I was wondering if there was yet an official CentOS implementation?
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I asked about 18 months ago if gallery2 was available in any of the CentOS repositories, and it seemed that at that time it was not. However, there was some talk of putting it in epel or epel-testing. But I looked just now, and did not find it there.
I actually installed gallery2 on my server by following the instructions at http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Preinstaller. But I've had a slight http problem on the server which might be related to gallery2 (wireshark seemed to show some odd calls on gallery2); so I was wondering if there was yet an official CentOS implementation?
I no longer am using gallery 2 but awhile back I did it using the noarch RPMs from Fedora 9.
However, I was running php 5.2.6 and not the 5.1.x that CentOS ships with. I do not believe that makes a difference.
If I recall - I also had to install php-Smarty from Fedora 9 (also a noarch rpm).
F9 I think is EOL - so try the F10 noarch RPMs. Look in F10 updates first.
Michael A. Peters wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I asked about 18 months ago if gallery2 was available in any of the CentOS repositories, and it seemed that at that time it was not. However, there was some talk of putting it in epel or epel-testing. But I looked just now, and did not find it there.
I actually installed gallery2 on my server by following the instructions at http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Preinstaller. But I've had a slight http problem on the server which might be related to gallery2 (wireshark seemed to show some odd calls on gallery2); so I was wondering if there was yet an official CentOS implementation?
I no longer am using gallery 2 but awhile back I did it using the noarch RPMs from Fedora 9.
However, I was running php 5.2.6 and not the 5.1.x that CentOS ships with. I do not believe that makes a difference.
If I recall - I also had to install php-Smarty from Fedora 9 (also a noarch rpm).
F9 I think is EOL - so try the F10 noarch RPMs. Look in F10 updates first. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I have recently (<10 days) installed gallery2 on my server I used tar.gz from their site version 2.3-full-en. As it is simple php and mysql and I have these from CentOS already it was no issue to get it working. What are you seeing that concerns you? I will check my install for similar issue if you like. HTH Rob
Rob Kampen wrote:
I actually installed gallery2 on my server by following the instructions at http://codex.gallery2.org/Gallery2:Preinstaller. But I've had a slight http problem on the server which might be related to gallery2 (wireshark seemed to show some odd calls on gallery2); so I was wondering if there was yet an official CentOS implementation?
I have recently (<10 days) installed gallery2 on my server I used tar.gz from their site version 2.3-full-en. As it is simple php and mysql and I have these from CentOS already it was no issue to get it working. What are you seeing that concerns you? I will check my install for similar issue if you like.
Thanks for the offer, but I found the reason for my httpd problems was quite different, arising from ipv6 experiments I had been trying.
The reason I suspected gallery2 was because there were a large number of errors entered in /etc/httpd/logs/error_log involving gallery2. But now I look at them nearly all involve google sites, and presumably arise from some kind of robotic search.
In fact the installation method I used (as described above) was remarkably simple, and didn't turn up any errors.
-
Michael A. Peters -
Rob Kampen -
Timothy Murphy