On 1/02/11 10:50 PM, James Hogarth wrote:

Work is currently ongoing on QA for 5.6 ... once that is out then you'll start seeing the other updates that depend on that.

Ah, so that's what it is. I had kind of assumed everyone had been distracted by work on CentOS 6, until I saw the recent massive update to CentOS 4.

Thanks.

Regards, Ben

On 1/02/11 11:13 PM, James Hogarth wrote:

Centos6 is pretty much on hold until 5.6 is out the door due to the number of systems it has an impact on (ie no existing C6 systems to update and many many C5 ones).

Now that is excellent news; exactly what I wanted to hear.

Regards, Ben

On 2/02/11 12:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:

On 02/01/2011 11:43 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:

...

Critical: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0169.html

This is irrelevant to CentOS, its an RHEL update; if there was to be a critical or a remotely exploiteable issue that comes up we would then do a release into 5.5, but mostly things are now building /linking into 5.6, so releasing those with out the deps they build against might cause interesting issue.

Fair enough. I must admit to not caring as much about the Java stuff anyway, I was mainly collating a list of notices which might correspond. I use the RH lists to give myself an idea of what is likely to appear from CentOS.

if there is specific concern about the kernel's released, those can be pushed into the c5-testing repo for early adopters..

Good to know, thanks.

Regards, Ben