I like to try out other distributions of Linux. Today I took a look at Mint Linux 8 and Fedora 12. I installed and updated each on a small partition -- actual physical install, not virtual machines. Both worked great at 1280x1024 (their defaults) but neither would let me use 1024x768 resolution. Both came with newer versions of Xorg, neither of which build an xorg.conf file. Mint gave me three settings, 1280x1024, 640x480 and something like 700x400(?). Fedora gave me the choice of 1024x768, but when I tried to use it, it just went black until timing out. When I downloaded and ran system-config-display, it built an xorg.conf file, which I modified to 1024x768 (by removing the 1280x1024 selection). When I tried rebooting, it locked up. (I have an Intel 865G video chip, BTW.)
So, what is it about the newer versions of Xorg that doesn't like 1024x758 resolution? At least not on an Intel Graphics chip? Just weird.
And I'm curious as to how Xorg determines its monitor resolution choices when there is no xorg.conf file. Is there a good tutorial on this subject available? Frustrating situation -- and I'm still nervous that Red Hat 6 is going to end up with the same issue -- if this is an Xorg problem with Intel it seems reasonable to assume that they will inherit it.
On Thursday 21 January 2010 09:37:11 Ron Blizzard wrote:
And I'm curious as to how Xorg determines its monitor resolution choices when there is no xorg.conf file.
X server queries the monitor for supported resolutions by reading the EDID data, and uses the best setting available as the default. See, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDID . Also take a look inside /var/log/Xorg.0.log and the output of xrandr for what was autodetected.
Is there a good tutorial on this subject available?
man xrandr
HTH, :-) Marko