I am shocked.
And still on the wrong list.
Ralph
OK, if you want me out, I'll unsubscribe. You're right, it's a list with a bad karma. I *knew* that people on the CentOS ML are much more _aggressive_ than people on the SciLinux ML.
R-C
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I am shocked.
And still on the wrong list.
OK, if you want me out, I'll unsubscribe. You're right, it's a list with a bad karma. I *knew* that people on the CentOS ML are much more _aggressive_ than people on the SciLinux ML.
It's not about that, you're probably getting me wrong there. But we can do *nothing* about administrative problems with EPEL - especially with the fedora wiki - as we have no stake in that. That's what the fedora lists are about, for epel it's the fedora-epel list.
Cheers,
Ralph
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 00:10 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I am shocked.
And still on the wrong list.
OK, if you want me out, I'll unsubscribe. You're right, it's a list with a bad karma. I *knew* that people on the CentOS ML are much more _aggressive_ than people on the SciLinux ML.
It's not about that, you're probably getting me wrong there. But we can do *nothing* about administrative problems with EPEL - especially with the fedora wiki - as we have no stake in that. That's what the fedora lists are about, for epel it's the fedora-epel list.
What's amazing is that he got his problem resolved, I would never have thought to post to this list to get something on the fedora wiki fixed. It's kinda like posting to a MS Word list a problem about OpenOffice.
Ray's reply should have taken it off this list and the two of them should have sorted it out off-list.
Well, less noise here than the fedora lists last I checked, and Ralph's wrong list reminder is much less rude than what I've seen on the fedora list also.
Paul
-
Paul -
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU -
Ralph Angenendt