On 4/14/09 3:12 AM, in article bfa89a870904140112s490d223ch440cf009d20e88df@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi" amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Terry Hull tah@nrg-inc.com wrote:
On 4/13/09 7:01 PM, in article bfa89a870904131701i2afd9b41j78b53b0611a9e462@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi" amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
The patches I need to make do break kABI. I just have not yet applied them. I was trying to get the base kernel to build before I added the complexity of patching it.
If the build still fails, please post the last portion of the error log (or e-mail the whole log file to me).
I have attached a compressed log file. The errors seem to be in the build of OCFS.
Thanks for the err log file. From the looks of it, the error is in the code itself as you noted. So, that should have nothing to do with kABI.
I checked my own log for the kernel 128.1.6 building but did not see anything (warnings and such) relating to ocfs2. You mentioned " have NOT installed any patches that will break KABI". Have you installed any patches at all, that is, patches that do not break kABI ? If so, would any of them touch the ocfs code?
Akemi
No, I have not added any patches at all to the source. I just modified the .spec file and compiled with the --without kabichk option. I also did not have any trouble building the kernel as long as kabichk was enabled.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Terry Hull tah@nrg-inc.com wrote:
On 4/14/09 3:12 AM, in article bfa89a870904140112s490d223ch440cf009d20e88df@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi" amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Terry Hull tah@nrg-inc.com wrote:
On 4/13/09 7:01 PM, in article bfa89a870904131701i2afd9b41j78b53b0611a9e462@mail.gmail.com, "Akemi Yagi" amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
The patches I need to make do break kABI. I just have not yet applied them. I was trying to get the base kernel to build before I added the complexity of patching it.
If the build still fails, please post the last portion of the error log (or e-mail the whole log file to me).
I have attached a compressed log file. The errors seem to be in the build of OCFS.
Thanks for the err log file. From the looks of it, the error is in the code itself as you noted. So, that should have nothing to do with kABI.
I checked my own log for the kernel 128.1.6 building but did not see anything (warnings and such) relating to ocfs2. You mentioned " have NOT installed any patches that will break KABI". Have you installed any patches at all, that is, patches that do not break kABI ? If so, would any of them touch the ocfs code?
Akemi
No, I have not added any patches at all to the source. I just modified the .spec file and compiled with the --without kabichk option. I also did not have any trouble building the kernel as long as kabichk was enabled.
Terry,
I normally build kABI compatible kernels, so seldom touch the kabichk-related part of the spec file. I'm now cc'ing this post to Alan Bartlett who routinely does it and has amended most part of the wiki article.
Alan,
This is the beginning of the thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-April/075066.html
Akemi
-
Akemi Yagi -
Terry Hull