Please tell me your opinion. How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc, rpms/srpms like this: http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fed...
-- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-legal-tp5726659.html Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
Please tell me your opinion. How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth the electrons used to transmit it.
If you are concerned about licencing and compliance then consult a lawyer.
On 18/05/14 05:21 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:00:32PM -0700, ngeorgop wrote:
Please tell me your opinion. How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc,
This is not a legal mailing list. Any opinion represented is not worth the electrons used to transmit it.
If you are concerned about licencing and compliance then consult a lawyer.
Stephen is right, you can only trust the legal advice of your own representative.
On 05/18/2014 04:00 PM, ngeorgop wrote:
Please tell me your opinion. How legal is to use, redistribute, include in installation cds, repos etc, rpms/srpms like this: http://pull-mirror.yandex.net/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/nonfree/fed...
I can tell you that Adobe contacted me personally to tell me that the CentOS Project was not authorized to distribute the chromium version of flash. You would need to get your own legal advise, but it is not within the terms of service from abode to distribute pepper-flash.
-
Digimer -
Johnny Hughes -
ngeorgop -
Stephen Harris