Hi,
It will be bug on &.2 but we are facing this issue on CentOS 6.8. In 6.8 also has this issue?
Please suggest.
Regards, Shagun
-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request@centos.org Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:30 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] CentOS Digest, Vol 161, Issue 22
Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGA... or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at centos-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type gvfs mount (John Hodrien) 2. Re: NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg (peter.winterflood) 3. Re: Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No go (G?tz Reinicke) 4. Re: CentOS-6.9 Bind-9.8.2 error messages (James B. Byrne) 5. Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Robert Heller) 6. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (James (CentOS ML)) 7. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Frank Cox) 8. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.) 9. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Jonathan Billings) 10. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type gvfs mount (Gordon Messmer) 11. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Robert Heller) 12. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Valeri Galtsev) 13. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Marcelo Ricardo Leitner) 14. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Valeri Galtsev) 15. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Jonathan Billings) 16. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type gvfs mount (John Hodrien) 17. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.) 18. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:09:38 +0100 (BST) From: John Hodrien J.H.Hodrien@leeds.ac.uk To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Specifying different options for different " smb" type gvfs mount Message-ID: nycvar.YEU.7.76.1806211308500.31795@pbzc-cp3201.yrrqf.np.hx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Toralf Lund wrote:
I known that I might use mount.cifs and related "fstab" entries as an alternative, but its password handling seems a lot less convenient.
If you're in an AD environment, you can probably do nicely with mount.cifs:
sec=krb5,multiuser
That way you don't have to deal with usernames/passwords at all.
jh
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:14:08 +0100 From: "peter.winterflood" peter.winterflood@ossi.co.uk To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org, anax anax@ayni.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg Message-ID: 16422442280.27db.2b6837a33dad96cb17d193f32630f285@ossi.co.uk Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
On 21 June 2018 12:13:02 "anax" anax@ayni.com wrote:
Hi Shagun check your settings of PEERDNS and IPV6_PEERDNS...
suomi
On 06/21/2018 08:33 AM, Maheshwari, Shagun wrote:
Hi,
I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am using below configuration for eth0 interface:
TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=eth0 UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=no PEERDNS=no PEERROUTES=yes IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes DNS1=<ipv4 address> DNS2=<ipv6 address>
Also, added dns=none in NetworkManager.conf file.
Whenever I am restarting NetworkManager, resolv.cfg gets updated and only ipv4 nameserver is displaced, whether I am expecting both the ips (ipv6 and ipv4 address to be present in resolv.cfg file.
Any suggestion here, how to achieve that??
Regards, Shagun _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdC A6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKV Vt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0Pj QLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y 2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6 s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RF ZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2F lists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA 6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt 6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLF AB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN 16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljn B-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP 90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.c entos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
I think this was a bug in 7.2 have you updated your rpms. Peerdns ignored. Regards peter
Sent with AquaMail for Android https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/dZe0_kxJdxrnAK4hEWUQEI2odnKSB2kkoxl3VuciC...
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:24:04 +0200 From: G?tz Reinicke goetz.reinicke@filmakademie.de To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No go Message-ID: 45ACB559-6295-4269-97EC-7353970C9F6F@filmakademie.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Am 18.06.2018 um 16:33 schrieb me@tdiehl.org:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, G?tz Reinicke wrote:
Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer gordon.messmer@gmail.com:
On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote:
I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that file in the %files section, so this is mysterious.
I too can confirm this behavior.
# rpm -qa krb* --triggers triggerun scriptlet (using /bin/sh) -- krb5-libs < 1.15.1-13 if ! grep -q 'includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d' /etc/krb5.conf ; then sed -i '1i # Other applications require this directory to perform krb5 configuration.\nincludedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/\n' /etc/krb5.conf fi
Looks like that's the culprit.
Good to know, but writing a rpmnew or rpmsave file would be nice to check against the life used file.
Agreed! IMO this is a packaging bug. Triggers do not drop rpmsave files. I suspect the chances of getting Red Hat to fix it are slim to none. Fixing it would most likely break other things for them.
The samba people are aware of that problem regarding the include line and are working on a patch ? the support at SerNet told me.
I agree they are aware of it but I suspect it is a low priority thing given they have known about this since 2016-12-29.
I do think it would be relatively easy for SerNet to patch around in their paid for rpms. alas I do not have the budget for them. :-(
The bug is available at https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/VxaZZYzfeWRqqUBqdb5dituD6zJkUGPZLQ4 oVo5wQHg=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt 6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLF AB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN 16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljn B-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP 90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzill a.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D12488 https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/VxaZZYzfeWRqqUBqdb5dituD6zJkUGPZLQ 4oVo5wQHg=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVV t6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQL FAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2Nd N16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2lj nB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiX P90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzil la.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D12488
Patched https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/HFkDaIm7MZYydWwFqssly0lRa9BWoWEEbokgCi9n1... https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/HFkDaIm7MZYydWwFqssly0lRa9BWoWEEbokgCi9n1t4=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D11573
/G?tz
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:31:56 -0400 From: "James B. Byrne" byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca To: "Gordon Messmer" gordon.messmer@gmail.com Cc: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.9 Bind-9.8.2 error messages Message-ID: 2720c48e462a326dad3d716c31325f43.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
On Wed, June 20, 2018 15:37, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/20/2018 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne via CentOS wrote:
I am encountering messages similar to this in the system logfile:
Jun 20 13:38:18 inet03 named[3720]: malformed transaction: dynamic/efa1f375d76194fa51a3556a97e641e61685f914d446979da50a551a4333f fd7.mkeys.jnl last serial 103538 != transaction first serial 103361
I have no idea what this means, what caused it, nor how to fix it. Any suggestions relevant to any of the above are most welcome.
I think I've seen this before.?? Are you auto-signing a zone for DNSSEC,
Yes
and does that zone appear in multiple views?
No
I stopped and restarted the BIND daemon and this appears to have corrected whatever issue was causing the errors to be generated.