Jerry Geis wrote:
/ Gents,
/>/ />/ I first installed the 32 bit version (as you might have read) of />/ centos 4.2, />/ after downloading x86_64 the install process/progress is about the same. />/ going VERY slow... />/ />/ The screen for formatting the partitions took a LONG time />/ (3 partitions 10 GIG, 2 GIG swap and 50 GIG). />/ While on that screen and moving the mouse it lagged big time and />/ could not keep up. />/ />/ Anyway just reporting that so far the 32 bit install and the 64 bit />/ install />/ is Exactly the same. So I am expecting that after install my cpu speed />/ will />/ still be reported LOW (997M vs a 2.4GiG for a 4000+ cpu). />/ />/ Any experiences out there with the 64 bit amd and maximizing speed when />/ plugged in whould be appreciated.
Quick update... On the Installing packages screen normally I see something like 15 minutes to install with this 64 bit 4000+ installing x86_64 it is posting 55 minutes.
This is what I mean by slooooow..
I hope I find what the deal is soon. I check in the BIOS and saw no settings. Only enable disable motherboard devices.
Jerry
/
Jerry Geis wrote:
/Quick update... On the Installing packages screen normally I see something like 15 minutes to install with this 64 bit 4000+ installing x86_64 it is posting 55 minutes.
This is what I mean by slooooow..
I hope I find what the deal is soon. I check in the BIOS and saw no settings. Only enable disable motherboard devices.
/
It may be just the hard drive. Compaq has been using ungodly slow Fujitsu 4200rpm drives of late. I experienced a substantial speedup on mine when I upgraded to a Hitachi Travelstar 7K100.
Cheers,
Chris Mauritz chrism@imntv.com wrote:
It may be just the hard drive. Compaq has been using ungodly slow Fujitsu 4200rpm drives of late. I experienced a substantial speedup on mine when I upgraded to a Hitachi Travelstar 7K100.
Have to 2nd that note.
Although the PowerNow!/Cool'n Quiet is having some effect, do _not_ expect desktop commodity/capacity disk performance out of a notebook HD. Even the 7200rpm notebook drives are still significantly slower than the 3.5" models.
We're currently experimenting with a Mini-ITX i915/Pentium-M system in-house with a Seagate 7200rpm 2.5" notebook SATA drive to see if it can drive multiple streams of 720p multimedia.