after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef:
after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
are other people on the list also /not/ seeing my mails?
Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your emails. It could simply be that they didn't read *every* email that's come through the list in the last few hours, so they didn't see yours.
Chill.
op 04-02-14 14:42, Mike Burger schreef:
Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your emails. It could simply be that they didn't read *every* email that's come through the list in the last few hours, so they didn't see yours.
Chill.
off course, you are right. My apologies.
yeah. my apologies too. didn't saw it. fresh problem & busy tuesday.
On 02/04/2014 02:50 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 04-02-14 14:42, Mike Burger schreef:
Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your emails. It could simply be that they didn't read *every* email that's come through the list in the last few hours, so they didn't see yours.
Chill.
off course, you are right. My apologies. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085
On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef:
after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
are other people on the list also /not/ seeing my mails?
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085
On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef:
after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
FYI,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414#c25 now says the bug has been fixed at RedHat, but the version number of the packages doesn't appear to be increased.
On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085
On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef:
after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
FYI,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414#c25 now says the bug has been fixed at RedHat, but the version number of the packages doesn't appear to be increased.
yes it has: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.src.rpm vs librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.src.rpm (note the .3 vs .2) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg < Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg@imag.fr> wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
FYI:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085
On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef:
after morning update of librsvg2
Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64
nautilus crashed with
nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
FYI,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414#c25%3E
now says the bug has been fixed at RedHat, but the version number of the packages doesn't appear to be increased.
yes it has: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.src.rpm vs librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.src.rpm (note the .3 vs .2) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html
I stand corrected!
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg@imag.fr wrote:
On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
temporary solution
yum downgrade librsvg2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414#c25 now says the bug has been fixed at RedHat, but the version number of the packages doesn't appear to be increased.
yes it has: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3.src.rpm vs librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.src.rpm (note the .3 vs .2) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html
The fixed version librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3 is syncing to the mirrors.
Akemi
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:03:42 +0100 Bane Ivosev wrote:
after morning update of librsvg2 Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64 nautilus crashed with nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f68b2d2733c sp 00007fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000]
Does this mean that we shouldn't update librsvg2 until another update is released?
-
Akemi Yagi -
Bane Ivosev -
Frank Cox -
Jim Perrin -
Johan Vermeulen -
Mike Burger -
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg -
Phelps, Matt