On Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:54:32 -0500, Frank Cox theatre@sasktel.net might just possibly have said:
F> Is Oracle a real alternative to Centos? I'm asking because genuinely F> don't know; I've never paid any attention to Oracle's Linux offering F> before now.
I've used Unix/Linux at Wright-Patterson AFB, USA since 1988 -- this includes Solaris starting at 2.5.1 up to 11, FreeBSD, and Linux. I used CentOS for several years and I'm a refugee simply because it was easier to get something containing the name "Oracle" approved for use on base. (All the stupid sh*t you've heard about gov't procurement is true.)
I *despise* Oracle the company, but I ran Oracle Linux as both a server for an Oracle DB and as my workstation starting Jan 2018 after a drive failure knocked my machine out of the park. Occasionally I had to dork around looking for a source RPM, but other than that I was fine with it. You use "yum" like anywhere else.
FWIW, my 6.10 installation had this in /etc/redhat-release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
Go to https://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/, poke around a bit, and you end up here: https://yum.oracle.com/oracle-linux-downloads.html
I just went to the ISO page and I can grab whatever I like without signing up for anything, so nothing's changed since I first used it.
I use FreeBSD on my home systems to avoid precisely this kind of crap, so this is *NOT* a recommendation for Oracle in general -- be ready for them to change the rules at any time.
Finally, I've been on this list for many years -- Johnny H. is the most responsive and least arrogant person I've ever seen, so please don't pee in his Wheaties.
-- Karl Vogel / vogelke AT pobox.com / I don't speak for the USAF or any company
Mangled song lyric: I can't climb this ceiling any more. Actual lyric: I can't fight this feeling anymore. (REO Speedwagon)
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:05 AM Karl Vogel vogelke+centos@pobox.com wrote: [snip]
FWIW, my 6.10 installation had this in /etc/redhat-release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
Only to point out that while in CentOS (8.3, but the same in 7.x) the situation is like this:
[g.cecchi@skull8 ~]$ ll /etc/redhat-release /etc/centos-release -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 30 Nov 10 16:49 /etc/centos-release lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 10 16:49 /etc/redhat-release -> centos-release [g.cecchi@skull8 ~]$
[g.cecchi@skull8 ~]$ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 8.3.2011
in Oracle Linux (eg 7.7) you get two different files:
$ ll /etc/redhat-release /etc/oracle-release -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 Aug 8 2019 /etc/oracle-release -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Aug 8 2019 /etc/redhat-release
$ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
$ cat /etc/oracle-release Oracle Linux Server release 7.7
This is generally done so that sw pieces officially certified only on upstream enterprise vendor and that test contents of the redhat-release file are satisfied. Using the lsb_release command on an Oracle Linux 7.6 machine:
# lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-4.1-amd64:core-4.1-noarch Distributor ID: OracleServer Description: Oracle Linux Server release 7.6 Release: 7.6 Codename: n/a #
Gianluca