Sorin Srbu wrote:

...

-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On

Behalf

...

Of Lucian@lastdot.org Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:24 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options

jalbum is a hog with large collections.. performance must be 5-6x less than that of picasa on my computer (amd athlon x2, 1 gb ram, sata drive, centos 5 32bit, around 8000 hires pictures)..

That bad?? Guess my Amd Duron/750 and 384MB ram is a no-go then...

---

---

CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I've been rather happy with Jalbum, mostly because of the wide range of capabilities. By default, it creates the album on your system...you can upload to their servers or your own, at your discretion. While picassa is certainly an answer, and one I use on occassion, I'm far happier using my own server(s) or hosting locally on my workstaion than relying solely on google's cloud (rock solid though it is...no negative connotation about google intended).

You also get what you want out of it...if it's a 'hog', consider if you're linking from thumbs to mid-size display and from *that* to original hi-res. That's my basic setup and I haven't had a problem with resources on my local workstation (1gb ram, 2,4mhz intel, 0.5TB drive, albums of 5K pictures or more, centos 5.3 32bit) or on my servers.

YMMV, -R