is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL?
I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages...
Installing: ffmpeg x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: a52dec x86_64 0.7.4-8.el6.rf rpmforge 89 k dirac-libs x86_64 1.0.2-4.el6 epel 335 k faac x86_64 1.26-1.el6.rf rpmforge 140 k ffmpeg-libpostproc x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 24 k libdc1394 x86_64 2.1.2-3.4.el6 base 117 k librtmp x86_64 2.3-1.el6.rf rpmforge 106 k libva x86_64 1.0.15-1.el6 epel 53 k opencore-amr x86_64 0.1.2-1.el6.rf rpmforge 417 k orc x86_64 0.4.16-6.el6 epel 146 k schroedinger x86_64 1.0.10-1.el6.rf rpmforge 591 k x264 x86_64 0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf rpmforge 1.0 M
which to me seems kinda scary, as I remember getting into conflicts between these in the past.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL?
I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages...
I'd recommend installing ffmpeg from Nux-dextop repo.
Akemi
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL?
I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages...
I'd recommend installing ffmpeg from Nux-dextop repo.
Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
+1 Great repo, I use it to supplement things that I cannot find in epel.
Am 18.09.2014 um 22:02 schrieb John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com:
is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL?
I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is ffmpeg, and I'm finding it on rpmforge only... but its install wants to mix epel and rpmforge packages...
Installing: ffmpeg x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 2.7 M Installing for dependencies: a52dec x86_64 0.7.4-8.el6.rf rpmforge 89 k dirac-libs x86_64 1.0.2-4.el6 epel 335 k faac x86_64 1.26-1.el6.rf rpmforge 140 k ffmpeg-libpostproc x86_64 0.6.5-1.el6.rf rpmforge 24 k libdc1394 x86_64 2.1.2-3.4.el6 base 117 k librtmp x86_64 2.3-1.el6.rf rpmforge 106 k libva x86_64 1.0.15-1.el6 epel 53 k opencore-amr x86_64 0.1.2-1.el6.rf rpmforge 417 k orc x86_64 0.4.16-6.el6 epel 146 k schroedinger x86_64 1.0.10-1.el6.rf rpmforge 591 k x264 x86_64 0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf rpmforge 1.0 M
which to me seems kinda scary, as I remember getting into conflicts between these in the past.
I suggest to use the priority yum plugin.
BTW - rpmforge is no longer maintained.
-- LF
On 9/19/2014 1:19 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
BTW - rpmforge is no longer maintained.
I actually meant to say, repoforge, which for all practical purposes is the successor of rpmforge, including the repo identifier name it uses.
Am 19.09.2014 um 10:25 schrieb John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com:
On 9/19/2014 1:19 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
BTW - rpmforge is no longer maintained.
I actually meant to say, repoforge, which for all practical purposes is the successor of rpmforge, including the repo identifier name it uses.
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/029506.html
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
-- LF
-
Akemi Yagi -
John R Pierce -
Leon Fauster -
Tom Bishop