On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell bferrell@baywinds.org wrote:

...

so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x

Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5

Thanks in advance

Bruce Ferrell

Bruce, *why*? Given that RHEL 3 was published in 1003, the codebase is over 7 years old, and even the commercial RHEL 3 is now on life support for extended support contracts. Are you looking for something specific?

Wow 1007 years old, that's some old code, was it chiseled in stone?

-Ross

On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ross Walker rswwalker@gmail.com wrote:

...

On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:

...

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell bferrell@baywinds.org wrote:

...

so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x

Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5

Thanks in advance

Bruce Ferrell

Bruce, *why*? Given that RHEL 3 was published in 1003, the codebase is over 7 years old, and even the commercial RHEL 3 is now on life support for extended support contracts. Are you looking for something specific?

Wow 1007 years old, that's some old code, was it chiseled in stone?

-Ross

Hey, silicon is silicon..... _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Yeah, I'm rebuilding a server with Oracle RAC and I wasn't sure exactly what version of RedHat was used to build it originally. Centos 5.5 results in the external iscsi volumes being improperly sized. It turns out Centos 3.5 works. Once, many years ago, someone told me he wouldn't tackle a job he was 100 percent sure of. This is one of those so I'm doing this very gingerly to avoide losing the DB on the raw disk

on 2/16/2011 7:39 AM Bowie Bailey spake the following:

On 2/14/2011 1:23 AM, Bruce Ferrell wrote:

...

Yeah, I'm rebuilding a server with Oracle RAC and I wasn't sure exactly what version of RedHat was used to build it originally. Centos 5.5 results in the external iscsi volumes being improperly sized. It turns out Centos 3.5 works. Once, many years ago, someone told me he wouldn't tackle a job he was 100 percent sure of. This is one of those so I'm doing this very gingerly to avoide losing the DB on the raw disk

If you are going with CentOS 3, you might as well go ahead and get 3.9.

3.5 + security updates = 3.9

And I would image all the raw drives before doing anything if you are not sure... Just a precaution.