Hello,
Anyone running rrdtool 1.2 from Dag's RPMs on CentOS 3 or 4?
Been using 1.0, thinking about upgrading.
Thx,
I'm using and it's OK. No error until now.
On 6/16/06, Francois Caen frcaen@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Anyone running rrdtool 1.2 from Dag's RPMs on CentOS 3 or 4?
Been using 1.0, thinking about upgrading.
Thx,
Francois Caen, RHCE, CCNA SpiderMaker, LLC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No error at all since months on centos 4 x86_64.
Cleber P. de Souza wrote:
I'm using and it's OK. No error until now.
On 6/16/06, Francois Caen frcaen@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Anyone running rrdtool 1.2 from Dag's RPMs on CentOS 3 or 4?
Been using 1.0, thinking about upgrading.
Thx,
Francois Caen, RHCE, CCNA SpiderMaker, LLC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 6/17/06, kadafax kadafax@gmail.com wrote:
No error at all since months on centos 4 x86_64.
Thank you folks. Upgraded last night and no problem so far. Love the anti-aliased look.
Dag, if you're listening: why have those RPMs as test RPMs?
Francois Caen wrote:
On 6/17/06, kadafax kadafax@gmail.com wrote:
No error at all since months on centos 4 x86_64.
Thank you folks. Upgraded last night and no problem so far. Love the anti-aliased look.
Dag, if you're listening: why have those RPMs as test RPMs?
If you've used these test rpms - provide feedback via the rpmforge lists and say that they are stable and what conditions you have used them under. It *will* move the test rpms to stable faster this way.
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Francois Caen wrote:
On 6/17/06, kadafax kadafax@gmail.com wrote:
No error at all since months on centos 4 x86_64.
Thank you folks. Upgraded last night and no problem so far. Love the anti-aliased look.
Dag, if you're listening: why have those RPMs as test RPMs?
If you've used these test rpms - provide feedback via the rpmforge lists and say that they are stable and what conditions you have used them under. It *will* move the test rpms to stable faster this way.
Well, for one. The 1.2 RPM packages lack functionality that 1.0 provided (like PHP bindings). They are also not a drop-in replacement for the 1.0 rrdtool, so if I would not release them as test-packages they would replace the 1.0 packages.
Not sure what the best way to proceed is in this case. I just looked at the renewed rrdtool website and in the download section there seems to be PHP bindings now that work with rrdtool 1.2.
Maybe rrdtool 1.2 is ready now for general usage.
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
-
Cleber P. de Souza -
Dag Wieers -
Francois Caen -
kadafax -
Karanbir Singh