The subject pretty much says it all. My ftp comes back with "ftp: ftp/tcp: unknown service" - unless I run it as root, in which case it works just fine.
What's going on here? Did I screw up a setting of mine or something?
Thanks.
mhr
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:27 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) on latestupdate from CentOS 5.0
The subject pretty much says it all. My ftp comes back with "ftp: ftp/tcp: unknown service" - unless I run it as root, in which case it works just fine.
What's going on here? Did I screw up a setting of mine or something?
Thanks.
Did the permissions on /etc/services get messed up?
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.
On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker rwalker@medallion.com wrote:
Did the permissions on /etc/services get messed up?
# ll /etc/services -rw-r----- 1 root root 362154 Aug 1 10:23 /etc/services
mhr
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:47 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0
On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker rwalker@medallion.com wrote:
Did the permissions on /etc/services get messed up?
# ll /etc/services -rw-r----- 1 root root 362154 Aug 1 10:23 /etc/services
Yeah... it should be 644
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.
On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker rwalker@medallion.com wrote:
Yeah... it should be 644
Ah, a light goes on. I have the root umask set to 027. I take it from this that it should be 022 or 002 - which is better/correct?
Thanks (mucho).
mhr
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:05 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd)onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0
On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker rwalker@medallion.com wrote:
Yeah... it should be 644
Ah, a light goes on. I have the root umask set to 027. I take it from this that it should be 022 or 002 - which is better/correct?
022 is what you'll want 002 leaks too much to the group.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.
-
Mark Hull-Richter -
Ross S. W. Walker