The audacious package is willing to wait that long
:)
Nope, because I've built it *for myself*, i.e. in my repo.
And was your patch rejected from the places you are complaining about?
There. Is. No. Question. About. Any. Patch.
When you build audacious from SPEC + tarball, it spits out audacious + audacious_plugins, both as RPMs and as SRPMs (actually, it spits around 15 plugins RPMs).
RPMforge misses the plugins, that's all. Probably just triggering a rebuild would fix it all.
Instead of talking for ages about patches, what builds and what doesn't, and why "better services" would need pay etc. maybe someone (Dag?) could have triggered the rebuild of audacious for 100 times in the meantime.
Truly yours, R-C
__________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
The audacious package is willing to wait that long
:)
Nope, because I've built it *for myself*, i.e. in my repo.
And was your patch rejected from the places you are complaining about?
There. Is. No. Question. About. Any. Patch.
When you build audacious from SPEC + tarball, it spits out audacious + audacious_plugins, both as RPMs and as SRPMs (actually, it spits around 15 plugins RPMs).
RPMforge misses the plugins, that's all. Probably just triggering a rebuild would fix it all.
Instead of talking for ages about patches, what builds and what doesn't, and why "better services" would need pay etc. maybe someone (Dag?) could have triggered the rebuild of audacious for 100 times in the meantime.
Truly yours, R-C
Looking at this from yet another angle, I believe that YOU are the only person on this list who has expressed an interest in "audacious" (whatever it is & does) for CentOS during these several days of rant. By some weird coincidence, you purport to have a working version. Bully for you! You allegedly have what you want. Most list members here seem to have what they want. I absolutely, definitely, positively, most assuredly have what I want and am free of the crap that I don't want, which would include "audacious". **And any half-baked, half-tested L&G package.** With so much contentment floating around, it surely makes you look like a 33rd Degree Horse's Ass to continue ranting about the damn thing, in the process, greatly diminishing any stature that has accumulated here deriving from your technical achievements.
-
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU -
Robert