Readers,
Openjdk and ibm java versions have failed to install, all reporting a bad elf, e.g.
./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin Preparing to install... Extracting the JRE from the installer archive... Unpacking the JRE... Extracting the installation resources from the installer archive... Configuring the installer for this system's environment... strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file
Launching installer...
./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin: /tmp/install.dir.4696/Linux/resource/jre/bin/java: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin: line 2506: /tmp/install.dir.4696/Linux/resource/jre/bin/java: Success
This problem is occurring because the default openjdk could not run davmail, either 32 or 64 bit versions. Any advice please?
Vreme: 12/16/2011 12:33 PM, e-letter piše:
Readers,
Openjdk and ibm java versions have failed to install, all reporting a bad elf, e.g.
./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin Preparing to install... Extracting the JRE from the installer archive... Unpacking the JRE... Extracting the installation resources from the installer archive... Configuring the installer for this system's environment... strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file
Launching installer...
./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin: /tmp/install.dir.4696/Linux/resource/jre/bin/java: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./ibm-java-i386-sdk-7.0-0.0.bin: line 2506: /tmp/install.dir.4696/Linux/resource/jre/bin/java: Success
This problem is occurring because the default openjdk could not run davmail, either 32 or 64 bit versions. Any advice please?
And system version? 5.?, 6.? 32 or 64-bit?
From: e-letter inpost@gmail.com
strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
It seems to need 32bits glibc ...
JD
On 12/16/2011 06:03 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: e-letter inpost@gmail.com
strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
It seems to need 32bits glibc ...
And you are likely trying to install it on a x86_64 system ... if I were to render a guess.
Further information:
the environment is centos60 64bit.
the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827
On 12/16/2011 08:09 AM, e-letter wrote:
Further information:
the environment is centos60 64bit.
the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827
But you are not trying to install openjdk, you are trying to install ibm-jdk
you need the x86_64 version, not the i386 version ... especially if you are upgrading something you already have installed.
On 12/16/2011 08:26 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/16/2011 08:09 AM, e-letter wrote:
Further information:
the environment is centos60 64bit.
the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827
But you are not trying to install openjdk, you are trying to install ibm-jdk
you need the x86_64 version, not the i386 version ... especially if you are upgrading something you already have installed.
If your goal is to install something else besides openjdk ... why not use Sun Java x86_64 from here:
http://javadl.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=58118
and follow the instructions here:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, e-letter inpost@gmail.com wrote:
Further information:
the environment is centos60 64bit.
the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827
Is that still a problem if you update to 6.1? Or at least update openjdk?
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:09 AM, e-letter inpost@gmail.com wrote:
Further information:
the environment is centos60 64bit.
the reason to change is the bug previously reported: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=827
Is that still a problem if you update to 6.1? Or at least update openjdk?
Wait, he's using icedtea? I recently installed it - a few weeks ago - and firefox reports java works just fine.
mark
Have tried to install various versions of java, none successful. The reason is that originally davmail32bit (my mistake to try) was found not to work with the original centos jdk. Then this was tried with davmail64bit which was also unsuccessful
e-letter wrote:
Have tried to install various versions of java, none successful. The reason is that originally davmail32bit (my mistake to try) was found not to work with the original centos jdk. Then this was tried with davmail64bit which was also unsuccessful
I would suggest that if openjdk doesn't work, you go with Sun/Oracle's java, which is the Source of All Java
mark, who cheerfully hates java
-
e-letter -
John Doe -
Johnny Hughes -
Les Mikesell -
Ljubomir Ljubojevic -
m.roth＠5-cent.us