Mario,
That is correct (at least on 4.0), and the appletalk kernel modules are not built, so you will have to build a custom kernel to use it. Once it the kernel is recompiled and appletalk is compiled, it works like a champ.
Netatalk is not hard to compile.
Michael Tracey
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org]On Behalf Of Mário Gamito Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:44 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Netatalk ???
Hi,
Is it from my eyes, or Centos (or for that matters, RHEL) doesn't include netatalk ????
If not, does it bring something else for the same porpous ?
Any help would be appreciated.
Warm regards, Mário Gamito _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
So, RedHat does not only includes netatalk. It lacks support for it in the kernel.
Tracey, Michael wrote:
Mario,
That is correct (at least on 4.0), and the appletalk kernel modules are not built, so you will have to build a custom kernel to use it. Once it the kernel is recompiled and appletalk is compiled, it works like a champ.
What's the best way to recompile the currrent kernel to support netatalk ?
1 - make menuconfig && make dep && make bzimage && make modules && make modules_install && make install ?
2 - Hack the kernel SRPM and rpm -Uvh it ?
Netatalk is not hard to compile.
Done that. I work with it since the begining of times.
Warm Regards, Mário Gamito
On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:25 PM, Mário Gamito wrote:
What's the best way to recompile the currrent kernel to support netatalk ?
1 - make menuconfig && make dep && make bzimage && make modules && make modules_install && make install ?
2 - Hack the kernel SRPM and rpm -Uvh it ?
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/sysadmin- guide/ch-custom-kernel.html
however, this version is for RHEL3 (and actually it first appeared in the manuals for 7.x, and hasn't been much updated, but it's still a reasonably good documentation of the Red Hat Way to recompile a kernel).
there does not seem to be an equivalent doc in the RHEL4 manuals, and the files referenced in the RHEL3 doc aren't in the same places (or aren't there at all), so i don't know how helpful this will be.
-steve
--- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 21:25 +0100, Mário Gamito wrote:
What's the best way to recompile the currrent kernel to support netatalk ?
1 - make menuconfig && make dep && make bzimage && make modules && make modules_install && make install ?
'make dep' is obsolete for 2.6. Not sure about 2.4.
2 - Hack the kernel SRPM and rpm -Uvh it ?
The RHN applet won't complain at you if you do it this way, whereas it will if you do it the old-fashioned way.
On Monday 04 April 2005 20:25, Mário Gamito wrote:
make dep is obsolete for the 2.6.x kernel series. after you have configure your kernel options it would be quite sufficient to issue a "make bzImage && make modules && make modules_install && make install"
Peter
Hi,
So, RedHat does not only includes netatalk. It lacks support for it in the kernel.
Tracey, Michael wrote:
Mario,
That is correct (at least on 4.0), and the appletalk kernel modules are not built, so you will have to build a custom kernel to use it. Once it the kernel is recompiled and appletalk is compiled, it works like a champ.
What's the best way to recompile the currrent kernel to support netatalk ?
1 - make menuconfig && make dep && make bzimage && make modules && make modules_install && make install ?
2 - Hack the kernel SRPM and rpm -Uvh it ?
Netatalk is not hard to compile.
Done that. I work with it since the begining of times.
Warm Regards, Mário Gamito _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Apr 5, 2005 12:51 AM, Peter Harmsen pharmsen@horizon.nl wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2005 20:25, Mário Gamito wrote:
make dep is obsolete for the 2.6.x kernel series. after you have configure your kernel options it would be quite sufficient to issue a "make bzImage && make modules && make modules_install && make install"
Or for simplicity 'make [all] modules_install'. The default make setting compiles modules as well.