Dear All,
I had a server running centos 5 and have recently upgraded with centos 5.1 dvd
how do i check the version of my new installated OS
thnks and regards
simon
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:25:00PM +0300, Mail Administrator wrote:
Dear All,
I had a server running centos 5 and have recently upgraded with centos 5.1 dvd
you don't need to "upgrade" with the dvd between point release of CentOS-5 (ie from 5.0 to 5.1 to 5.2 ....) it's being taken care by yum.
how do i check the version of my new installated OS
see the FAQ: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-51ce9db5abbde6b4dbe39b0531d01b34f80f...
Cheers,
Tru
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:25:00PM +0300, Mail Administrator wrote:
Dear All,
I had a server running centos 5 and have recently upgraded with centos 5.1 dvd
you don't need to "upgrade" with the dvd between point release of CentOS-5 (ie from 5.0 to 5.1 to 5.2 ....) it's being taken care by yum.
how do i check the version of my new installated OS
see the FAQ: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-51ce9db5abbde6b4dbe39b0531d01b34f80f...
Cheers,
Tru
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an updated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 box, I get:
# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
Does anyone know what upstream does with the 5.1.z updates? Does /etc/redhat-release show "5.1.z" or something?
-Greg
I seem to remember reading a release note somewhere that the way centos 5 worked now was that the /etc/redhat-releases would not reflect properly (man I wish I could find the reference to that).
And that you needed to do something like:
rpm -qa centos-release
For example on one of my systems, I do: cat /etc/redhat-release
I get:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
But I know for sure that this system is a 5.1
So When i run the:
rpm -qa centos-release
I get:
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
Which seems more accurate.
DNK
On 3-Apr-08, at 7:46 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an updated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 box, I get:
# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
Does anyone know what upstream does with the 5.1.z updates? Does / etc/redhat-release show "5.1.z" or something?
-Greg
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks DNK,
u r absolutely right the cat /etc/redhat-release does not reflect the version correctly but the rpm -q centos-release does it perfectly
thnksss n really apprecite
cheers
regards
simon
I seem to remember reading a release note somewhere that the way centos 5 worked now was that the /etc/redhat-releases would not reflect properly (man I wish I could find the reference to that).
And that you needed to do something like:
rpm -qa centos-release
For example on one of my systems, I do: cat /etc/redhat-release
I get:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
But I know for sure that this system is a 5.1
So When i run the:
rpm -qa centos-release
I get:
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
Which seems more accurate.
DNK
On 3-Apr-08, at 7:46 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an updated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 box, I get:
# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
Does anyone know what upstream does with the 5.1.z updates? Does / etc/redhat-release show "5.1.z" or something?
-Greg
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Glad it helped!
d
On 3-Apr-08, at 11:47 PM, Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks DNK,
u r absolutely right the cat /etc/redhat-release does not reflect the version correctly but the rpm -q centos-release does it perfectly
thnksss n really apprecite
cheers
regards
simon
I seem to remember reading a release note somewhere that the way centos 5 worked now was that the /etc/redhat-releases would not reflect properly (man I wish I could find the reference to that).
And that you needed to do something like:
rpm -qa centos-release
For example on one of my systems, I do: cat /etc/redhat-release
I get:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
But I know for sure that this system is a 5.1
So When i run the:
rpm -qa centos-release
I get:
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
Which seems more accurate.
DNK
On 3-Apr-08, at 7:46 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an updated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 box, I get:
# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
Does anyone know what upstream does with the 5.1.z updates? Does / etc/redhat-release show "5.1.z" or something?
-Greg
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
-- Network ADMIN:
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Greg Bailey wrote:
Mail Administrator wrote:
Thanks guys for the quick reply
btw cat /etc/redhat-release gives me
CentOS release 5 (Final) so as per the FAQ guess its uptodate
thnks again regards
simon
Interesting that this seems to deviate from upstream. Checking an updated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 box, I get:
# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
Does anyone know what upstream does with the 5.1.z updates? Does /etc/redhat-release show "5.1.z" or something?
-Greg
OF COURSE it deviates from upstream. We are a separate distribution
This has been covered again and again and it is in an FAQ.
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-51ce9db5abbde6b4dbe39b0531d01b34f80f...
Upstream is GOING to (supposedly) provide a "Z Series" (as in 5.1.1 and 5.2.0). However, we do not yet know exactly how that will work in practice until they implement it.
IF we support the "Z series" update sets separately (we have not decided completely if we have the "RESOURCES" to do that) then once you lock onto a "Z Series" you would have something different in your /etc/redhat-release.
IF you DO NOT lock into a "Z Series" release then you would have "Release 5" ... not 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 or 5.3 ... in your /etc/release. This is because that is exactly what you are doing if you do not deviate to a "Z Series". Deviation (staying on the 5.1.z series, for example) would mean that you will stay on 5.1.1 (and then 5.1.2 and 5.1.3) while 5.2.0, then 5.3.0 (and 5.2.1,5.1.2) and 5.4.0 (and 5.3.1,5.2.2,5.1.3) become available. Of course, at that point, they are "End of Life"ing the 5.1 branch .. so there will not be a 5.1.4 and you would at that point need to plan an upgrade to some other branch (5.5.0, 5.4.1, 5.3.2, or 5.2.3).
SO ... being on Release 5 means, you are getting normal updates, just like before ... not being on release 5 means you are on a "Z Series", if/when we support them.
This is JUST semantics ... it has nothing to do with anything except some text in a file that helps us to understand what release you are on.
Hi,
On CentOS 5 system (2.6.18-53) the "who" or "w" command return only the remote login.
The local user login is not show.
Any help ?
Regards.
__________________________
Ce message (et toutes ses pièces jointes éventuelles) est confidentiel et établi à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'IFP décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message.
This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. IFP should not be liable for this message.
Visitez notre site Web / Visit our web site : http://www.ifp.fr __________________________
On 03/04/2008, Mail Administrator mailadmin@baladia.gov.kw wrote:
how do i check the version of my new installated OS
# rpm -q centos-release centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 <----- Indicates CentOS 5, update 1. #
Alan.