Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 4 i386 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:768 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2005:768 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2005:768 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x) mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 3 i386 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2005:768 Critical CentOS 3 i386 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 9. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) 10. CESA-2005:768 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:04:06 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:769 Critical CentOS 4 i386 mozilla - security update To: CentOS-Announce centos-announce@centos.org Message-ID: 1126361046.3560.9.camel@myth.home.local Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:769
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-769.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors:
i386: mozilla-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-chat-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-devel-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-mail-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.i386.rpm
src: mozilla-1.7.10-1.4.2.centos4.src.rpm
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, centos-announce-request@centos.org wrote:
After spending a few minutes to try and unsubscribe from centos-announce digest mails, I noticed centos@centos.org is subscribed to centos-announce, not me.
Can we disable this ?
People can opt-in to this if they like digest mails.
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 14:33 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, centos-announce-request@centos.org wrote:
After spending a few minutes to try and unsubscribe from centos-announce digest mails, I noticed centos@centos.org is subscribed to centos-announce, not me.
Can we disable this ?
People can opt-in to this if they like digest mails.
Dag,
This has been brought up several times ... the documentation of the "CentOS General Discussion List" clearly says that "update announcements" will be made daily to it ...
This was a compromise some time back when all announcements were made to this (the centos@centos.org ) list. This was because a significant number of people wanted all announcements also made to this list. It was a compromise to change it from all to daily.
If there is not a significant number of people who want daily announcements of security updates to the "CentOS General Discussion List" then maybe we can make announcements only on the announcement list.
So ... what does everyone think
1. All announcements only on the "Announce List"
or
2. All announcements on the announce list and a daily summary also to the "General Discussion List".
My vote is ... I am subscribed to both, so I don't care :)
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 14:33 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, centos-announce-request@centos.org wrote:
After spending a few minutes to try and unsubscribe from centos-announce digest mails, I noticed centos@centos.org is subscribed to centos-announce, not me.
Can we disable this ?
People can opt-in to this if they like digest mails.
Dag,
This has been brought up several times ... the documentation of the "CentOS General Discussion List" clearly says that "update announcements" will be made daily to it ...
This was a compromise some time back when all announcements were made to this (the centos@centos.org ) list. This was because a significant number of people wanted all announcements also made to this list. It was a compromise to change it from all to daily.
If there is not a significant number of people who want daily announcements of security updates to the "CentOS General Discussion List" then maybe we can make announcements only on the announcement list.
So ... what does everyone think
- All announcements only on the "Announce List"
or
- All announcements on the announce list and a daily summary also to
the "General Discussion List".
My vote is ... I am subscribed to both, so I don't care :)
I have tried to unsubcribe from this several times and also emailed admin to be removed but to no avail...I don't want this so I agree with Dag.
regards tom
--- Maciej ¯enczykowski maze@cela.pl wrote:
I have tried to unsubcribe from this several times
and also emailed admin to
be removed but to no avail...I don't want this so
I agree with Dag.
as do I,
MaZe. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Is there a archive of the annouce list so if there is need you can do a search on it? If there is then i would vote for no need for this email.
just my $.02
Steven
"On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 'Requires Windows or better'. So I installed Linux."
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This has been brought up several times ... the documentation of the "CentOS General Discussion List" clearly says that "update announcements" will be made daily to it ...
I'm sorry, I wasn't aware. I thought it was intentional but didn't know there had been discussions. (I don't read everything in full, and should have looked in the archives)
Anyhow, it confused my ignorant brain and I bet I'm not the only one who spent some time unsubscribing and investigating. That was why I mailed.
If the decision was to leave it, I'm happy to ignore it.
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
On Sun, September 11, 2005 5:59 am, Johnny Hughes said:
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 14:33 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, centos-announce-request@centos.org wrote:
After spending a few minutes to try and unsubscribe from centos-announce digest mails, I noticed centos@centos.org is subscribed to centos-announce, not me.
Can we disable this ?
People can opt-in to this if they like digest mails.
Dag,
This has been brought up several times ... the documentation of the "CentOS General Discussion List" clearly says that "update announcements" will be made daily to it ...
This was a compromise some time back when all announcements were made to this (the centos@centos.org ) list. This was because a significant number of people wanted all announcements also made to this list. It was a compromise to change it from all to daily.
If there is not a significant number of people who want daily announcements of security updates to the "CentOS General Discussion List" then maybe we can make announcements only on the announcement list.
So ... what does everyone think
- All announcements only on the "Announce List"
or
- All announcements on the announce list and a daily summary also to
the "General Discussion List".
My vote is ... I am subscribed to both, so I don't care :)
I vote to leave it as it is.
Marko
-
centos-announce-request＠centos.org -
Dag Wieers -
Johnny Hughes -
Maciej Żenczykowski -
Marko A. Jennings -
Steven Vishoot -
Tom