Also, Upi, people need more than work, they need work patterns. Making arch releases in a particular order is safer than an 'as available' order in many cases.
So the particular order is 'i386 first'.
If you were a (co)developer/tester/maintainer/distributor, your work pattern would be significant.
So: Help row the boat, or (happily) enjoy the scenery.
Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner@gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838
Jay.Hilliard@disney.com 09/15/05 01:47AM >>>
Pasi Pirhonen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:52:15PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We usually release our first arch (i386) with a week of the upstream release and our other arches within a week after the first arch release.
I find it a bit offensive when it's brough out as it is above. It really should be 'we have a policy of releasing i386 first even when anything else would be ready before'.
Well, I appreciate the efforts of Johnny H. and if it takes a week or two, regardless of ARCH, so be it. He's doing a lot. What happens if he needs an extended vacation? He *is* CentOS, you know (that's not sarcasm).
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 05:02 -0700, Brian T. Brunner wrote:
Well, I appreciate the efforts of Johnny H. and if it takes a week or two, regardless of ARCH, so be it. He's doing a lot. What happens if he needs an extended vacation? He *is* CentOS, you know (that's not sarcasm).
Here here. Reminds me, I need to send in a check one of these days soon (credit card, whatever). I gladly paid SuSE $180 a year for a quality distro, I should be doing the same here.
Preston
-
Brian T. Brunner -
Preston Crawford