Hi all,
I'm in the middle of setting up a build environment for OpenWRT and it looks like the packages need flex.
Looking at the CentOS repositories, it looks as though the flex package is tagged as fc6 - it also looks like there is no flex-devel package at all.
Does anyone know what the go is here?
Available Packages Name : flex Arch : i386 Version: 2.5.4a Release: 41.fc6 Size : 124 k Repo : base
-- Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Steven
Steven Haigh netwiz@crc.id.au wrote: Hi all,
I'm in the middle of setting up a build environment for OpenWRT and it looks like the packages need flex.
Looking at the CentOS repositories, it looks as though the flex package is tagged as fc6 - it also looks like there is no flex-devel package at all.
Does anyone know what the go is here?
Available Packages Name : flex Arch : i386 Version: 2.5.4a Release: 41.fc6 Size : 124 k Repo : base
-- Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Its already a DEV package that includes headers.
[root@centos tlviewer]# rpm -ql flex /usr/bin/flex /usr/bin/flex++ /usr/bin/lex /usr/include/FlexLexer.h /usr/lib64/libfl.a /usr/lib64/libl.a /usr/share/doc/flex-2.5.4a /usr/share/doc/flex-2.5.4a/COPYING /usr/share/doc/flex-2.5.4a/NEWS /usr/share/doc/flex-2.5.4a/README /usr/share/man/man1/flex++.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/flex.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/lex.1.gz
On 9/29/07, Steven Haigh netwiz@crc.id.au wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the middle of setting up a build environment for OpenWRT and it looks like the packages need flex.
Looking at the CentOS repositories, it looks as though the flex package is tagged as fc6 - it also looks like there is no flex-devel package at all.
Some REDHAT package come from fc6 without any changes. Centos did the same and used the same name as REDHAT.
Does anyone know what the go is here?
Available Packages Name : flex Arch : i386 Version: 2.5.4a Release: 41.fc6 Size : 124 k Repo : base
-- Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Salam,
What is the problem the haan?????????? go and install flex.
Regards,
Umair Shakil ETD
On 9/29/07, Steven Haigh netwiz@crc.id.au wrote:
Hi all,
I'm in the middle of setting up a build environment for OpenWRT and it looks like the packages need flex.
Looking at the CentOS repositories, it looks as though the flex package is tagged as fc6 - it also looks like there is no flex-devel package at all.
Does anyone know what the go is here?
Available Packages Name : flex Arch : i386 Version: 2.5.4a Release: 41.fc6 Size : 124 k Repo : base
-- Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:38 +0500, umair shakil wrote:
Salam,
What is the problem the haan?????????? go and install flex.
Regards,
Umair Shakil ETD
On 9/29/07, Steven Haigh netwiz@crc.id.au wrote: Hi all,
I'm in the middle of setting up a build environment for OpenWRT and it looks like the packages need flex. Looking at the CentOS repositories, it looks as though the flex package is tagged as fc6 - it also looks like there is no flex-devel package at all. Does anyone know what the go is here? Available Packages Name : flex Arch : i386 Version: 2.5.4a Release: 41.fc6 Size : 124 k Repo : base -- Steven Haigh<snip sig stuff>
I googled to find the post in the CentOS lists, but my memory/skills aren't up to snuff this morning. Maybe you'll have better luck, if you look.
Anyway, in a recent thread that mentioned the fact that fc6 stuff was in the CentOS repository, it was pointed out that Red Hat kept some fc6 tags on stuff they included in the final release (of 5.0?). There are probably other packages that are similarly tagged.
Because CentOS tries to be near 100% upstream-compatible, they have also kept the tags.
HTH -- Bill
-
Alain Spineux -
mark pryor -
Steven Haigh -
umair shakil -
William L. Maltby