junior.listas wrote:
Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???
JC
Yes .. i had to build it for my Asus Eee PC 900 , but the wiki already knew it : http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Asus/Eeepc
Don't forget that i've built the kmod for the stock 5.2 kernel but it survives a kernel update (thanks to the `weak-updates` philosophy on el5) If you already have a newer kernel on your box, let me know and i'll build a specific version if needed
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas junior.listas@gmail.comwrote:
Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ???
JC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/ HTH
Sorry, may i be wrong, but
I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos??
thanks for your attention...
JC
Eduardo Grosclaude escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:07 PM, junior.listas <junior.listas@gmail.com mailto:junior.listas@gmail.com> wrote:
Somebody already get atl2.ko compiled in centos5 ??? JC _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Not exactly your question, but I managed to make it work thanks to http://repo.redhat-club.org/redhat/5/SRPMS/ HTH
-- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:29 AM, junior.listas junior.listas@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry, may i be wrong, but
I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos??
thanks for your attention...
I was unable to compile the module provided with the board (nor the kernel itself, by the way) under any CentOS 5 kernel choice. However, the repo I pointed to worked flawlessly for me. The binary RPMs are OK too. Did not know about the link you mentioned.
The link is the same that come with the board, but new versions.....
I just can't understand why this modules compiles ok with any kernel, except centos kernel...
JC
Eduardo Grosclaude escreveu:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:29 AM, junior.listas <junior.listas@gmail.com mailto:junior.listas@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry, may i be wrong, but I was compiled this module for other distro, with kernel 2.6.18, from http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/, the the version is 2.0.5, Wy we use 1.0 version?? There is some note for why the module ( 2.0 ) does not compile under centos?? thanks for your attention...
I was unable to compile the module provided with the board (nor the kernel itself, by the way) under any CentOS 5 kernel choice. However, the repo I pointed to worked flawlessly for me. The binary RPMs are OK too. Did not know about the link you mentioned.
-- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos