Hi,
I want to use Havp Version 0.86 with SQUID on CENTOS 4.4 and 5. But, no Havp 0.86 RPM still can not be found. I want to build Havp 0.86 RPM and SRPM by using the tarball. So, I got havp.spec file written for Havp 0.82 and changed its version to Version: 0.86 .
Then, I did below command.
[root@worldnet SPECS]# rpmbuild -ta havp.spec error: Name field must be present in package: (main package) error: Version field must be present in package: (main package) error: Release field must be present in package: (main package) error: Summary field must be present in package: (main package) error: Group field must be present in package: (main package) error: License field must be present in package: (main package)
then, It gave the above error.
then, I tried below command. [root@worldnet SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba havp.spec error: File /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/havp- init.patch: No such file or directory
then, It gave the above error.
What are these errors. How can I solve this?
any instructions to build havp 0.86 RPM out of havp-0.86.tar.gz?
[root@worldnet SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba havp.spec error: File /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/havp- init.patch: No such file or directory
It seems that the SPEC file (of older version) does some patching to the sources, you can edit the SPEC file and comment it out or delete the patch part, in the end you are better of customizing the SPEC file for your needs and system.
If you need more help I could look the spec file and do some RPM building, I have a CentOS 5 machine myself.
Good Luck!
Hi Carols,
It seems that the SPEC file (of older version) does some patching to
the sources, you can edit the SPEC file and comment it out or delete the patch part, in the end you are better of customizing the SPEC file for your needs and system.
If you need more help I could look the spec file and do some RPM building, I have a CentOS 5 machine myself.
By now, I have already built havp SRPM and RPM out of tarabll. I had to include a patch . Then, it worked. Anyway, This is my first time to built and SRPM and RPM out of a tarball. SO I am new to this. So , I am sending my havp.spec file for you to look at. pls see below.
[root@worldnet ~]# cat /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/havp.spec # $Id$ # Authority: dag
# Tag: test
Summary: HTTP anti-virus proxy filter Name: havp Version: 0.86 Release: 1 License: GPL Group: System Environment/Daemons URL: http://www.server-side.de/
Source: http://www.server-side.de/download/havp-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gzhttp://www.server-side.de/download/havp-%25%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz Patch0: havp-init.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
#BuildRequires: httpd-devel, bzip2-devel, gmp-devel, curl-devel, clamav-devel, openssl-devel BuildRequires: bzip2-devel, gmp-devel, curl-devel, clamav-devel, openssl-devel
%description HAVP (HTTP AntiVirus proxy) is a proxy with an anti-virus filter. It does not cache or filter content. At the moment the complete traffic is scanned. The reason for this is the chance of malicious code in nearly every filetype e.g. HTML (JavaScript) or Jpeg.
I aim to stop especially dialer or browser exploits. But writing a http Anti Virus Proxy is a real dilemma! Huge downloads are a problem for virus scanning proxies. A Client should not receive data which is unchecked by the virus scanner, but big downloads should not timeout.
%prep %setup %patch0 -p0 -b .init
%{__perl} -pi.orig \ -e 's|^# (TEMPLATEPATH) .+$|$1 /etc/havp/templates/en|;' \ -e 's|^# (WHITELIST) .+$|$1 /etc/havp/whitelist|;' \ -e 's|^# (BLACKLIST) .+$|$1 /etc/havp/blacklist|;' \ etc/havp/havp.config
%build %configure \ --enable-ssl-tunnel
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
%install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__install} -Dp -m0755 havp/havp %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/havp %{__install} -Dp -m0755 etc/init.d/havp %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/havp
%{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/havp/ %{__cp} -r etc/havp/* %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/havp/
%{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/log/havp/ %{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/run/havp/
%clean %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
%pre if ! /usr/bin/id havp &>/dev/null; then /usr/sbin/useradd -r -d %{_localstatedir}/log/havp -s /bin/sh -c "havp" havp || \ %logmsg "Unexpected error adding user "havp". Aborting installation." fi
%post /sbin/chkconfig --add havp
%preun if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then /sbin/service havp stop &>/dev/null || : /sbin/chkconfig --del havp fi
%postun if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then /usr/sbin/userdel havp || %logmsg "User "havp" could not be deleted." fi
%files %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) %doc ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL update-conf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/havp/ %config %{_initrddir}/havp %{_sbindir}/havp
%defattr(-, havp, havp, 0755) %{_localstatedir}/log/havp/ %{_localstatedir}/run/havp/
%changelog * Tue Aug 22 2006 Dag Wieers < dag@wieers.com> - 0.7.9-1 - Cosmetic changes.
* Wed May 31 2006 Bernard 'Tux' Lheureux <tux at portalinux dot org> 0.7.9-2 - Corrected the specfile to make it installable on CentOS 4.x - Created and applied some patches to make it chkconfig compatible - Created and applied a patch to make config reflect the correct location of the files
* Tue May 30 2006 Jim Perrin <jperrin at gmail dot com> 0.7.9-1 - Initial build for CentOS, - Specfile generation... still some work to do...
Pls edit the above file in a nice manner, if needed.
And, I would also like to know why I had to use rpmbuild -ba option instead of rpmbuild -ta, while building this out of a tarball.
Hope to hear from you.
Good Luck!
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I was a bit concerned that the patch won't apply to a new version of the package, but if your package compiled fine, then it should be ok.
The differences between using -ba and -ta is that -ta looks for the SPEC file inside the tarball while -ba doesn't (check the man page).
Regards, Carlos Ruvalcaba
-
Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela -
Indunil Jayasooriya