Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS.
From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository enabled.
I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS. Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
Gionatan Danti wrote:
I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS. Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't tried):
http://zfsonlinux.org/ https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS
to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page:
https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/
unless someone with some authority says that you can't do this.
Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto:
I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't tried):
http://zfsonlinux.org/ https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS
to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page:
https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/
unless someone with some authority says that you can't do this.
Sure, this is the simplest path. Anyone has a good reason to be against it? That said, I keep the idea that SIG would be highly preferable. Anyone is using ZFS on this list? Any ideas? Thanks.
I'm using ZFS On Linux with CentOS 6 since almost two years. http://zfsonlinux.org/ I'm not using it to boot from it or for any vm stuff, but just for storage disks.
Recently updated to ZOL version 0.7.9. To install, I simply follow the instructions from this page: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS Apply the modifications listed in the section "kABI-tracking kmod". For CentOS 6, after installation, make sure to run the following: $ service zfs-import start $ service zfs-mount start $ service zfs-share start $ service zfs-zed start $ chkconfig zfs-import on $ chkconfig zfs-mount on $ chkconfig zfs-zed on $ chkconfig zfs-share on
I played a bit with it on CentOS 7, with older ZOL version 0.7.4. Again, follow instructions in the section "kABI-tracking kmod". For CentOS 7, after installation, make sure to run the following: $ systemctl preset zfs-import-cache zfs-import-scan zfs-mount zfs-share zfs-zed zfs.target $ systemctl enable zfs-import-scan
Hope this helps.
Patrick.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Gionatan Danti g.danti@assyoma.it wrote:
Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto:
I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't tried):
http://zfsonlinux.org/ https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS
to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page:
https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/
unless someone with some authority says that you can't do this.
Sure, this is the simplest path. Anyone has a good reason to be against it? That said, I keep the idea that SIG would be highly preferable. Anyone is using ZFS on this list? Any ideas? Thanks.
-- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris. Just recently there was an issue with data loss. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
hth Lucian
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gionatan Danti" g.danti@assyoma.it To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2018 22:19:22 Subject: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository
Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS.
From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository enabled.
I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS. Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
-- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
But besides this issue it was in my experience rock solid.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:40 PM Nux! nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris. Just recently there was an issue with data loss. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
hth Lucian
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gionatan Danti" g.danti@assyoma.it To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2018 22:19:22 Subject: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository
Hi list, we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux more intergrated with current CentOS.
From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository enabled.
I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS. Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
-- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Il 03-07-2018 15:39 Nux! ha scritto:
Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris. Just recently there was an issue with data loss. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
I know; I was on the very same github issue you linked. While the bug was very unfortunate, ZFS remain an exceptionally strong and reliable filesystem.
Let me ask again: anything is preventing to update the CentOS 3rd party repository page with ZoL repo? Regards.