On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the image and select "Save Image As...", firefox crashes.
Final messages from stderr: (firefox:3401): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system [Child 3502, Chrome_ChildThread] WARNING: pipe error (3): Connection reset by peer: file /builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-60.1.0/ipc/chromium/src/chrome/common/ipc_channel_posix.cc, line 353 Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
I've reported this on RHEL bugzilla (1601254), but on the off chance that this is a problem with the CentOS build I'm posting here as well. This is firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 on CentOS 6.10.
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM Robert Nichols rnicholsNOSPAM@comcast.net wrote:
On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the image and select "Save Image As...", firefox crashes.
Final messages from stderr: (firefox:3401): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system [Child 3502, Chrome_ChildThread] WARNING: pipe error (3): Connection reset by peer: file /builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-60.1.0/ipc/chromium/src/chrome/common/ipc_channel_posix.cc, line 353 Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
I've reported this on RHEL bugzilla (1601254), but on the off chance that this is a problem with the CentOS build I'm posting here as well. This is firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 on CentOS 6.10.
-- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or Phoenix.
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
Niki
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
-- LF
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
-- LF
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re saving images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kay Schenk kay.schenk@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS < centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to
the
/usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
-- LF
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re saving images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
--
MzK
"Less is MORE." _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Any file operation, i.e. one that opens the file chooser, or tries to print to a file, will fail because of the bug I mentioned in another thread, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852
The fix is to replace the /opt/bin/firefox wrapper script with the patched version in that bug listing. I believe this will be fixed in a 60.1.0-6 version when RH gets around to releasing it (and Johnny gets time to build the CentOS version!).
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 19:08:50 -0400 Matthew Phelps wrote:
Any file operation, i.e. one that opens the file chooser, or tries to print to a file, will fail because of the bug I mentioned in another thread, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852
This is peculiar. I just tried right-clicking on an image, then "Save Image As" and it worked fine.
Is this because I'm using Mate and not Gnome?
firefox-60.1.0-4.el7.centos.x86_64
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:47:04 -0600 Frank Cox wrote:
This is peculiar. I just tried right-clicking on an image, then "Save Image As" and it worked fine.
And that would be because I'm using Centos 7 and not Centos 6 where this bug applies.
*Cough*
Sorry about the noise, folks.
On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re saving images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
You would like it even less if you had to build all the toolsets to get it to build in the first place :)
On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around 2003, when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to a different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re saving images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
You would like it even less if you had to build all the toolsets to get it to build in the first place :)
The good news seems to be that so far all the bugs found are also upstream (redhat source) bugs and not introduced by the CentOS build process .. so they are being worked on upstream.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:55 PM Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <
centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit :
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to
the
/usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around
2003,
when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to
a
different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re
saving
images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
You would like it even less if you had to build all the toolsets to get it to build in the first place :)
The good news seems to be that so far all the bugs found are also upstream (redhat source) bugs and not introduced by the CentOS build process .. so they are being worked on upstream.
Update is out now upstream:
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2218
On 07/18/2018 09:37 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:55 PM Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <
centos@centos.org
wrote:
Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr:
Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : > This is a known issue. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to
the
> /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around
2003,
when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or
Phoenix.
Netscape? :-)
I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to
a
different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every major release.
Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ listinfo ?
Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts.
This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a work-/desktopstation.
I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re
saving
images. BAH!
Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll invietigate that further at some point.
So far, I am not happy with this new version.
You would like it even less if you had to build all the toolsets to get it to build in the first place :)
The good news seems to be that so far all the bugs found are also upstream (redhat source) bugs and not introduced by the CentOS build process .. so they are being worked on upstream.
Update is out now upstream:
I am building it now .. this build should be straight forward and released in a couple of hours (after build, sign, and passing our CI Suite t_functional (https://ci.centos.org/view/CentOS-Core/).
All the build requirements are the same that are already in place for the last Firefox 60 build.
On 07/15/2018 12:49 PM, Matthew Phelps wrote:
This is a known issue. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to the /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:19 PM Robert Nichols rnicholsNOSPAM@comcast.net wrote:
On any web page with an image, if i right-click on the image and select "Save Image As...", firefox crashes.
Final messages from stderr: (firefox:3401): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system [Child 3502, Chrome_ChildThread] WARNING: pipe error (3): Connection reset by peer: file /builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-60.1.0/ipc/chromium/src/chrome/common/ipc_channel_posix.cc, line 353 Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
I've reported this on RHEL bugzilla (1601254), but on the off chance that this is a problem with the CentOS build I'm posting here as well. This is firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 on CentOS 6.10.
The patch for bug 1596852 fixes the problem for me. Thanks much. My bugzilla search wasn't deep enough to uncover that one.
-
Frank Cox -
Johnny Hughes -
Kay Schenk -
Leon Fauster -
Matthew Phelps -
Nicolas Kovacs -
Robert Nichols