Hi,
I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap server)? So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly.
Thanks.
Brian.
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:27 +0100, Brian Schueler wrote:
I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap server)? So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly.
I would be *extremely* surprised if this was evolution's fault. For all its issues, that's one I've not seen from it.
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:27 +0100, Brian Schueler wrote:
I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap server)? So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly.
I would be *extremely* surprised if this was evolution's fault. For all its issues, that's one I've not seen from it.
Oh, I've seen it quite often here on the mailing list, so it has to be possible to bring Evolution to not write an In-Reply-To: or References: header ...
Cheers,
Ralph
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 11:33 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:27 +0100, Brian Schueler wrote:
I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap server)? So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly.
I would be *extremely* surprised if this was evolution's fault. For all its issues, that's one I've not seen from it.
Oh, I've seen it quite often here on the mailing list, so it has to be possible to bring Evolution to not write an In-Reply-To: or References: header ...
I don't doubt that messages which originated with evolution could have headers arbitrarily removed by broken or misconfigured MTAs. I also don't doubt that evolution could misinterpret existing headers when displaying threads. I simply have seen no irrefutable proof that evolution breaks threading via replies of its own accord.
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 00:27 +0100, Brian Schueler wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to reply messages (e.g. to the cross-build-env in centos-devel) but my replies get posted as a new thread. I'm using Emulution 2.8 and I think Evolution eats the in-reply-to information. Is there anyone who also uses Evolution (especially in conjunction with a Scalix imap server)? So please tell me the right settings to acting not so disturbingly.
As a starting point
tools->settings->Composer Preferences->Reply Style
Generally, on the main menu bar, "Help".
Thanks.
Brian.
<snip sig stuff>
-
Brian Schueler -
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams -
Ralph Angenendt -
William L. Maltby