Will there be a centos 5 -centosplus repo? Now I not asking for one now or when will there be one, just if there will be one in the future. I am interested in an updated kernel for the various flavors of file systems, jfs,xfs,etc. Thanks.
On 4/23/07, Tom Bishop bishoptf@gmail.com wrote:
Will there be a centos 5 -centosplus repo? Now I not asking for one now or when will there be one, just if there will be one in the future. I am interested in an updated kernel for the various flavors of file systems, jfs,xfs,etc. Thanks.
A member of the CentOS team wrote on the CentOS Forum yesterday that CentOS Plus 5 would be available in a week to 10 days.
Akemi
Thanks much!!!
On 4/23/07, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/23/07, Tom Bishop bishoptf@gmail.com wrote:
Will there be a centos 5 -centosplus repo? Now I not asking for one now
or
when will there be one, just if there will be one in the future. I am interested in an updated kernel for the various flavors of file systems, jfs,xfs,etc. Thanks.
A member of the CentOS team wrote on the CentOS Forum yesterday that CentOS Plus 5 would be available in a week to 10 days.
Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Thanks much!!!
On 4/23/07, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote: On 4/23/07, Tom Bishop bishoptf@gmail.com wrote: > Will there be a centos 5 -centosplus repo? Now I not asking for one now or > when will there be one, just if there will be one in the future. I am > interested in an updated kernel for the various flavors of file systems, > jfs,xfs,etc. Thanks.
A member of the CentOS team wrote on the CentOS Forum yesterday that CentOS Plus 5 would be available in a week to 10 days. Akemi
To that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
Lets test them so we can move um into centosplus.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote:
To that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
Will there still be a difference in the xfs add-in module and the one included in the centoplus kernel?
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 07:57 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
To that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
Will there still be a difference in the xfs add-in module and the one included in the centoplus kernel?
No ... the xfs module for the normal kernels and the one built for the CentOS Plus kernels are the built from the same code.
The CentOSPlus kernel just has other things also turned on too.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
To that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
Lets test them so we can move um into centosplus.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
Thanks! -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN jay.leafey@mindless.com
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
Tarun
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 kernel ... let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and turn on firewire.
I'll get another kernel out today for testing
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 kernel ... let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and turn on firewire.
I'll get another kernel out today for testing
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
That's funny, I actually look at that last night, but since I moved from i386 to x86_64, I only looked at the kernel-xen i386.config file in the kernel SRPM and saw that CONFIG_JFS_FS=m. Now that I look in the x86_64 kernel, it is not set. I'm going to try and rebuild as well.. just for the heck of it.
Thanks Johnny! Tarun
On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 kernel ... let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and turn on firewire.
I'll get another kernel out today for testing
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
That's funny, I actually look at that last night, but since I moved from i386 to x86_64, I only looked at the kernel-xen i386.config file in the kernel SRPM and saw that CONFIG_JFS_FS=m. Now that I look in the x86_64 kernel, it is not set. I'm going to try and rebuild as well.. just for the heck of it.
Well I changed that, and rebuilt the rpms, and no love. rpm -qpl kernel or kernel-xen don't show any jfs components. kernel-debuginfo- common shows a bunch of jfs stuff but they are just .c files. No help there.
I guess I'll see what Johnny comes up with. Probably a more serious build bug. (FWIW, I just did a rpmbuild --bb kernel-2.6.spec after install the SRPM)
Tarun
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 11:45 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 > on my > test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note > that it > didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this > intentional or > merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a > server is > probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus > kernel > on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No > problem if > it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel > if it's > that important to me.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
Akemi
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Sigh, This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before actually looking at the RPMs....
It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get Centos to actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed something up, too.
I have this line in /etc/fstab /dev/md2 /export jfs defaults 1 1
and when I do a mount /export I get mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs'
uname -a Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any ideas?
I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 kernel ... let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and turn on firewire.
I'll get another kernel out today for testing
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
That's funny, I actually look at that last night, but since I moved from i386 to x86_64, I only looked at the kernel-xen i386.config file in the kernel SRPM and saw that CONFIG_JFS_FS=m. Now that I look in the x86_64 kernel, it is not set. I'm going to try and rebuild as well.. just for the heck of it.
Well I changed that, and rebuilt the rpms, and no love. rpm -qpl kernel or kernel-xen don't show any jfs components. kernel-debuginfo- common shows a bunch of jfs stuff but they are just .c files. No help there.
I guess I'll see what Johnny comes up with. Probably a more serious build bug. (FWIW, I just did a rpmbuild --bb kernel-2.6.spec after install the SRPM)
Here is the problem .... Red Hat has built some generic config file templates that they apply to the config files that are in the SOURCES directory (using a Perl script) before they copy them to the BUILD directory.
These templates actually turn off things, even if you put them in the config files.
I guess that this allows the same config files to be used for RHEL and FC ... with certain things that are on in FC turned off in RHEL.
It took a little bit of time for me to actually see that RH had built this into the prep stage of the kernel SRPM.
However, we should be set now ... holy cow ... now they are even building SRPMS that are smarter than me :D
I will post another mail after I have moved the new kernels into place ... probably in less that 12 hours.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On 4/25/07 12:47 PM, "Johnny Hughes" mailing-lists@hughesjr.com spake:
Here is the problem .... Red Hat has built some generic config file templates that they apply to the config files that are in the SOURCES directory (using a Perl script) before they copy them to the BUILD directory.
These templates actually turn off things, even if you put them in the config files.
I guess that this allows the same config files to be used for RHEL and FC ... with certain things that are on in FC turned off in RHEL.
It took a little bit of time for me to actually see that RH had built this into the prep stage of the kernel SRPM.
However, we should be set now ... holy cow ... now they are even building SRPMS that are smarter than me :D
I will post another mail after I have moved the new kernels into place ... probably in less that 12 hours.
Were you able to get these into place?
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 22:54 -0700, Ryan Ordway wrote:
On 4/25/07 12:47 PM, "Johnny Hughes" mailing-lists@hughesjr.com spake:
Here is the problem .... Red Hat has built some generic config file templates that they apply to the config files that are in the SOURCES directory (using a Perl script) before they copy them to the BUILD directory.
These templates actually turn off things, even if you put them in the config files.
I guess that this allows the same config files to be used for RHEL and FC ... with certain things that are on in FC turned off in RHEL.
It took a little bit of time for me to actually see that RH had built this into the prep stage of the kernel SRPM.
However, we should be set now ... holy cow ... now they are even building SRPMS that are smarter than me :D
I will post another mail after I have moved the new kernels into place ... probably in less that 12 hours.
Were you able to get these into place?
They should be in place now (2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plus.1)
Johnny can you bee more specific on how you go about and correct this? I need to recompile with the same support as the plus build but I also need to change the frequency timer. That works but I have no reiserfs, etc support. Where do you go to change the settings to get this to stick. I tried looking for a per script that set these settings as mentioned in your description below but was unable to find where they are setting it. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
On 4/27/07, Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 22:54 -0700, Ryan Ordway wrote:
On 4/25/07 12:47 PM, "Johnny Hughes" mailing-lists@hughesjr.com spake:
Here is the problem .... Red Hat has built some generic config file templates that they apply to the config files that are in the SOURCES directory (using a Perl script) before they copy them to the BUILD directory.
These templates actually turn off things, even if you put them in the config files.
I guess that this allows the same config files to be used for RHEL and FC ... with certain things that are on in FC turned off in RHEL.
It took a little bit of time for me to actually see that RH had built this into the prep stage of the kernel SRPM.
However, we should be set now ... holy cow ... now they are even building SRPMS that are smarter than me :D
I will post another mail after I have moved the new kernels into place ... probably in less that 12 hours.
Were you able to get these into place?
They should be in place now (2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plus.1)
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 23:48 -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Johnny can you bee more specific on how you go about and correct this? I need to recompile with the same support as the plus build but I also need to change the frequency timer. That works but I have no reiserfs, etc support. Where do you go to change the settings to get this to stick. I tried looking for a per script that set these settings as mentioned in your description below but was unable to find where they are setting it. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
What I did what modify the Kernel Spec file to not use the generic template code. I did this by removing that section of code completely from the spec file.
So, I removed this section of code completely from the "%prep" section for CentOSPlus spec:
==================================================================================== #if a rhel kernel, apply the rhel config options %if 0%{?rhel} for i in %{all_arch_configs} do mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done for i in $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/kernel-%{kversion}-{i586,i686,i686-PAE,x86_64}*.config do echo i is this file $i mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-x86-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done for i in $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/kernel-%{kversion}-ppc64.config do echo i is this file $i mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-ppc64-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done %endif #if a olpc kernel, apply the olpc config options %if 0%{?olpc} for i in %{all_arch_configs} do mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-olpc-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done %endif ====================================================================================
That mod should be in spec file for CentOSPlus .... in this SRPM:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos....
(also the i586, i686, x86_64 kernel-2.6.18* SOURCE files from that SRPM are also the config files for what is enabled in the CentOSPlus kernel)
<snip>
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Much appreciated Johnny, thanks for taking the time to explain what and where. I'll start using the plus SRPMs from here out and then I only need to modify for the timer frequency. Thanks.
On 4/28/07, Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 23:48 -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Johnny can you bee more specific on how you go about and correct this? I need to recompile with the same support as the plus build but I also need to change the frequency timer. That works but I have no reiserfs, etc support. Where do you go to change the settings to get this to stick. I tried looking for a per script that set these settings as mentioned in your description below but was unable to find where they are setting it. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
What I did what modify the Kernel Spec file to not use the generic template code. I did this by removing that section of code completely from the spec file.
So, I removed this section of code completely from the "%prep" section for CentOSPlus spec:
==================================================================================== #if a rhel kernel, apply the rhel config options %if 0%{?rhel} for i in %{all_arch_configs} do mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done for i in $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/kernel-%{kversion}-{i586,i686,i686-PAE,x86_64}*.config do echo i is this file $i mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-x86-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done for i in $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/kernel-%{kversion}-ppc64.config do echo i is this file $i mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-rhel-ppc64-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done %endif #if a olpc kernel, apply the olpc config options %if 0%{?olpc} for i in %{all_arch_configs} do mv $i $i.tmp $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/merge.pl $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/config-olpc-generic $i.tmp > $i rm $i.tmp done %endif
====================================================================================
That mod should be in spec file for CentOSPlus .... in this SRPM:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos....
(also the i586, i686, x86_64 kernel-2.6.18* SOURCE files from that SRPM are also the config files for what is enabled in the CentOSPlus kernel)
<snip>
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4/24/07, Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules.
I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909
So, hopefully it will be added...
It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we find we need) and respin the kernels for final release.
Needless to say, new kernels in the testing directory now have IEEE1394 support.
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/
My CentOS box identified a camcorder and kino could communicate with it without any additional action from me. Very nice. Thank you.
Akemi
On Tue, April 24, 2007 12:39 pm, Jay Leafey wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
To that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
Lets test them so we can move um into centosplus.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 on my test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note that it didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this intentional or merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a server is probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus kernel on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No problem if it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel if it's that important to me.
What does plus do fer ya?
On 4/24/07, Paul unix@bikesn4x4s.com wrote:
What does plus do fer ya?
Look here:
http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/CentOSPlus
Akemi
Sure no problem, can I get the src RPM for the kernel also, I like to run this in Vmware and want to change the timer freq 10 100Hz. Otherwise I will just use the jfs/reiserfs utils on their own. Thanks for the link.
On 4/24/07, Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:
Thanks much!!!
On 4/23/07, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote: On 4/23/07, Tom Bishop bishoptf@gmail.com wrote: > Will there be a centos 5 -centosplus repo? Now I not asking for one now or > when will there be one, just if there will be one in the future. I am > interested in an updated kernel for the various flavors of file systems, > jfs,xfs,etc. Thanks.
A member of the CentOS team wrote on the CentOS Forum yesterday that CentOS Plus 5 would be available in a week to 10 days. AkemiTo that end ... there is a CentOS-5 CentOSPlus kernel (and XFS modules for the normal CentOS 5 kernels, all xfs /reisferfs / jfs tools) in the testing repo here:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/
Lets test them so we can move um into centosplus.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Akemi Yagi -
Jay Leafey -
Johnny Hughes -
Les Mikesell -
Paul -
Ryan Ordway -
Tarun Reddy -
Tom Bishop