Johnny,
Any new information here?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:10 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:26 AM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org]
On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20
given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get enough attention to the issues and just do a build without needing
to
rely on what redhat is doing internally ?
Yes, I second that!!
The motion being seconded, I now move the question. (Sorry, Roberts Rulesof Order are a fascination of mine.)
But there's been no discussion....
And CentOS just rebuilds RHEL. There are "extras", but I don't know if those are CentOS-specific.
mark, has played parliamentarianSorry, no discussion. The question has been moved. :) (I kid...)
Yes, you moved, but there was no second to calling the question.....
<snip> mark "best use of Robert's Rules: to shut up someone who will go on and on and on...."
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu:
Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/
thought ...
-- LF
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu
: Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and libs.
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu
: Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and libs.
as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the organizational layer and less on the technical one.
-- LF
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <
leonfauster@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <
mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu
: Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and
libs.
as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the organizational layer and less on the technical one.
-- LF
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <
leonfauster@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <
mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu
: Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and
libs.
as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the organizational layer and less on the technical one.
On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally would try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.
ARGH .. autocorrect ... s/work/would
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.
What is it that is actually missing in CentOS6? Would it be stuff that is already available in the devtoolset SCL's - or would build under that? If that would work, why fight with other ways of doing it?
Chromium fans might want to check this also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9164251
Apparently there will be problems on kernels not supporting TSYNC (not sure how to check for this).
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Les Mikesell" lesmikesell@gmail.com To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2015 15:19:29 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.
What is it that is actually missing in CentOS6? Would it be stuff that is already available in the devtoolset SCL's - or would build under that? If that would work, why fight with other ways of doing it?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works.
Thanks. We are proceeding along those lines, but these things take time in an enterprise environment :)
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <
leonfauster@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian robark@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <
leonfauster@googlemail.com>
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <
mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu
: Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
Fedora will not have our problems as they have much newer compiler and
libs.
as EPEL is Fedora SIG, the above idea was on the organizational layer and less on the technical one.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Johnny Hughes -
Leon Fauster -
Les Mikesell -
Nux! -
Phelps, Matthew -
Robert Arkiletian