I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Barry Brimerlists@brimer.org wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
I will check into bluefish. Thank you. And, when I googled for "SeaMonkey+RPM" a couple of minutes ago, I found this thread. http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/160041-seamonkey-rpm-centos-5-2-32-bit-yum-repository.html Apparently, I brought this up last September on the list and that's when I installed KomPozer. From the contents of that thread, probably kompozer or bluefish are the way to go on Linux and *not* SeaMonkey.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Barry Brimerlists@brimer.org wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
bluefish http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/
I will check into bluefish. Thank you. And, when I googled for "SeaMonkey+RPM" a couple of minutes ago, I found this thread. http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/160041-seamonkey-rpm-centos-5-2-32-bit-yum-repository.html Apparently, I brought this up last September on the list and that's when I installed KomPozer. From the contents of that thread, probably kompozer or bluefish are the way to go on Linux and *not* SeaMonkey. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
The binary from http://getseamonkey.com/ will run just fine on Centos 5.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Lucian@lastdot.orglucian@lastdot.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Barry Brimerlists@brimer.org wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
The binary from http://getseamonkey.com/ will run just fine on Centos 5.
I may install the SeaMonkey Composer and see whether I like that better than Kompozer.
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
What's wrong with your favourite text editor and preview in Firefox?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ned Sliderned@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
What's wrong with your favourite text editor and preview in Firefox?
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It always seemed to me that the only logical reason for FrontPage to purposely mess up the tag order was in the hopes that someday M$ would be the only ones capable of detangling it. Without FrontPage generating such messy html, i think you will find hand editing html/xhtml/xml to be not so difficult. O'Reilly's Head First HTML css and xhtml is a good book. http://www.headfirstlabs.com/books/hfhtml/
eclipse and some plugins as documened here: http://web-design.lovetoknow.com/Eclipse_HTML_Editor
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Rob Townleyrob.townley@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ned Sliderned@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
<snip>
It always seemed to me that the only logical reason for FrontPage to purposely mess up the tag order was in the hopes that someday M$ would be the only ones capable of detangling it. Without FrontPage generating such messy html, i think you will find hand editing html/xhtml/xml to be not so difficult. O'Reilly's Head First HTML css and xhtml is a good book. http://www.headfirstlabs.com/books/hfhtml/
eclipse and some plugins as documened here: http://web-design.lovetoknow.com/Eclipse_HTML_Editor
In addition to the bad HTML code produced by FrontPage, the Server Extensions for Linux were EOL a long time ago. I want to get away from FrontPage and Windoze.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Rob Townleyrob.townley@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ned Sliderned@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
<snip> > > It always seemed to me that the only logical reason for FrontPage to > purposely mess up the tag order was in the hopes that someday M$ would > be the only ones capable of detangling it. Without FrontPage > generating such messy html, i think you will find hand editing > html/xhtml/xml to be not so difficult. O'Reilly's Head First HTML css > and xhtml is a good book. http://www.headfirstlabs.com/books/hfhtml/ > > eclipse and some plugins as documened here: > http://web-design.lovetoknow.com/Eclipse_HTML_Editor
In addition to the bad HTML code produced by FrontPage, the Server Extensions for Linux were EOL a long time ago. I want to get away from FrontPage and Windoze. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Afaik, OpenOffice can output HTML files. Therefore one can build a document with text, tables, images etc and then export it as HTML. Sure, it will prolly look like crap when compared to (let's say) what Dreamweaver can do, but still, it helps those who have no clue about web design and only need a rudimentary homepage.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Lucian@lastdot.orglucian@lastdot.org wrote: <snip>
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
<snip>
Afaik, OpenOffice can output HTML files. Therefore one can build a document with text, tables, images etc and then export it as HTML. Sure, it will prolly look like crap when compared to (let's say) what Dreamweaver can do, but still, it helps those who have no clue about web design and only need a rudimentary homepage.
I have OO3 installed, so I will check that out as another option.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ned Sliderned@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
What's wrong with your favourite text editor and preview in Firefox?
End goal and that will probably produce better HTML.
At Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:17:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
First of all WYSIWYG and HTML are really mutually exclusive ideas. The *best* you are going to get (if the editor is sane and does not make hardwired assumptions about the end-user's browser) is control over the relative placement of content. At worst, the page will like fine in one partitular browser, at one partitular window size, with one set of fonts installer, and look horrible otherwise, with text and/or graphics overlaping, etc.
That said, have you looked at nvu? http://www.net2.com/nvu/
The other option is to move away from 'hand edited HTML' and use a web-based CMS, such as WordPress.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Robert Hellerheller@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:17:31 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
First of all WYSIWYG and HTML are really mutually exclusive ideas. The *best* you are going to get (if the editor is sane and does not make hardwired assumptions about the end-user's browser) is control over the relative placement of content. At worst, the page will like fine in one partitular browser, at one partitular window size, with one set of fonts installer, and look horrible otherwise, with text and/or graphics overlaping, etc.
That said, have you looked at nvu? http://www.net2.com/nvu/
The other option is to move away from 'hand edited HTML' and use a web-based CMS, such as WordPress.
Robert: KompoZer is a project that built on nvu, which apparently is a project that stopped. I just looked at Bluefish, incredibly powerful, but harder for me to learn to use than KompoZer. Your idea about using WordPress is a brand new idea for me and I will look into that, as another option. Thank you. Lanny
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Robert Hellerheller@deepsoft.com wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
First of all WYSIWYG and HTML are really mutually exclusive ideas. The The other option is to move away from 'hand edited HTML' and use a web-based CMS, such as WordPress.
Curious about WordPress, although it's blogging SW. I installed it (and the dependencies) with yum, but it's not shown in the GNOME "Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress? [lanny@dell2400 ~]$ whereis wordpress wordpress: /etc/wordpress /usr/share/wordpress TIA
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Curious about WordPress, although it's blogging SW. I installed it (and the dependencies) with yum, but it's not shown in the GNOME "Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress? [lanny@dell2400 ~]$ whereis wordpress wordpress: /etc/wordpress /usr/share/wordpress
you configure it in your web server (/etc/httpd/conf.d/?????.conf) reload apache, and access it via a web browser like http://hostname.domain/pathtowordpress/
At Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:11:38 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Robert Hellerheller@deepsoft.com wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark (MHR) uses SeaMonkey. Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. I found this article: http://webdesign.about.com/od/htmleditors/tp/aatpwyslinux.htm when I googled. Recommendations? TIA!
First of all WYSIWYG and HTML are really mutually exclusive ideas. The The other option is to move away from 'hand edited HTML' and use a web-based CMS, such as WordPress.
Curious about WordPress, although it's blogging SW. I installed it (and the dependencies) with yum, but it's not shown in the GNOME "Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress?
WordPress is NOT a local desktop application. It only makes sense installed on a web server. Unless you are running Apache (httpd), and MySQL server on your desktop machine, it really makes little sense to install it there. I have it on *my* 'desktop' machine, but I am indeed running Apache, MySQL server, etc. and have my 'desktop' machine set up to be a local (not seen on the public InterNet) web server -- I do this to test things like CGI scripts, web pages, and (presently) WordPress hacks (I am coding my own WordPress theme for my company website). *I* do this so as to confine in-development bugs [eg 500 Internal Server Error type messages], etc. to my local machine and not put up totally broken web sites while I work on stuff. I would expect that you are not going to be messing with PHP code or write your own theme from scratch, etc. What you need to do is talk to your hosting provider about getting WordPress installed on your web host. This also means your hosting provider needs to set you up with a MySQL database w/ MySQL username & password. Once that is done you would just launch the web browser of your choice (eg Firefox, Seamonkey, etc.) and go to http://your.domain.com/ and set things up from there.
[lanny@dell2400 ~]$ whereis wordpress wordpress: /etc/wordpress /usr/share/wordpress TIA _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Robert Hellerheller@deepsoft.com wrote:
<snip> GNOME
"Applications" menu. How do I launch WordPress?
WordPress is NOT a local desktop application. It only makes sense installed on a web server. Unless you are running Apache (httpd), and MySQL server on your desktop machine, it really makes little sense to
<snip> Robert and John: Thank you for the explanations. I will uninstall WordPress from my Desktop!
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. Recommendations?
People often think this is a joke, but by far the easiest way to build a website is:
a) learn proper XHTML and CSS. There's tutorials galore on the internet. I preferred a (paper) book. Choose yours.
b) use your favourite text editor. I like Vim, since it's light and has syntax highlighting. Here's Vim in action on a web page:
http://www.kikinovak.net/images/vim.png
And here's the resulting page:
http://www.microlinux.fr/documentation.html
If you really don't want to use Vim, I'd recommend Bluefish.
Cheers,
Niki Kovacs
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Niki Kovacscontact@kikinovak.net wrote:
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that is easier on a FrontPage user. Recommendations?
People often think this is a joke, but by far the easiest way to build a website is:
a) learn proper XHTML and CSS. There's tutorials galore on the internet. I preferred a (paper) book. Choose yours.
b) use your favourite text editor. I like Vim, since it's light and has syntax highlighting. Here's Vim in action on a web page:
http://www.kikinovak.net/images/vim.png
And here's the resulting page:
http://www.microlinux.fr/documentation.html
If you really don't want to use Vim, I'd recommend Bluefish.
Probably I am going to use KompoZer, for the near future. Once I learn how to do the images, links, etc., that I am used to FrontPage doing for me, in HTML, Bluefish looks like the way to go. I have Bluefish installed on my desktop, and in the GNOME menu, it is in the "Programming" area, rather than "Internet", where KompoZer is. Bluefish is a very powerful application.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years, KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know
<snip> Answering my own thread, in case anyone else is interested in this topic. Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. It lacks a lot of stuff I'm used to in M$ FrontPage, but it is *far* easier for me to use than the Bluefish Editor and I will use KompoZer, until I learn how to do a lot of things in HTML with Bluefish, which is very slick. Reading the documentation for KompoZer....
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux.
Note that the last time I checked, Kompozer doesn't run on newer versions of Fedora.
Not that this matters when you're using Centos, of course.
On 7/2/09 12:10 PM, "Frank Cox" theatre@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux.
Note that the last time I checked, Kompozer doesn't run on newer versions of Fedora.
Not that this matters when you're using Centos, of course.
If you have an SRPM for it, it should build just fine.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Gary Greeneggreene@minervanetworks.com wrote:
On 7/2/09 12:10 PM, "Frank Cox" theatre@sasktel.net wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:17:45 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
Thank you, to everyone who replied! Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux.
Note that the last time I checked, Kompozer doesn't run on newer versions of Fedora.
Not that this matters when you're using Centos, of course.
If you have an SRPM for it, it should build just fine.
Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more stable on Linux than the current version, but I don't see an SRPM available. They show an RPM someone contributed for FC10, but not a SRPM. This is the first update for KompoZer in about 20 months. Lanny
Hi Lanny,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more stable on Linux than the current version,
Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 version) is more stable than the 0.7 branch.
but I don't see an SRPM available.
Indeed there is none for 0.8a4, but there is one for 0.8a3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/kompozer/kompozer-0.8a3-fc10-...
See all files here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/
OTOH, I believe building this from source might become very tricky, since it is based on Mozilla code I can only guess the nightmare of dependencies to get it done... Although less than ideal, you might have more luck just downloading and unpacking the binary pre-compiled packages which should have all the libraries prepared to work in an alternate path under a directory such as /opt or /usr/local.
But if you manage to build the SRPM for 0.8a3, building one for 0.8a4 should be only the matter of downloading the latest source tarball and changing the version number inside the specfile, I wouldn't expect more than that since the differences should be small.
They show an RPM someone contributed for FC10, but not a SRPM. This is the first update for KompoZer in about 20 months.
0.8a3 seems to be only a couple of weeks older than 0.8a4.
HTH, Filipe
On 7/2/09, Filipe Brandenburger filbranden@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more stable on Linux than the current version,
Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 version) is more stable than the 0.7 branch.
Filipe: You are correct about that. :-)
but I don't see an SRPM available.
Indeed there is none for 0.8a4, but there is one for 0.8a3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/kompozer/kompozer-0.8a3-fc10-...
See all files here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/
Found it.
OTOH, I believe building this from source might become very tricky, since it is based on Mozilla code I can only guess the nightmare of dependencies to get it done... Although less than ideal, you might have more luck just downloading and unpacking the binary pre-compiled packages which should have all the libraries prepared to work in an alternate path under a directory such as /opt or /usr/local.
Not install as RPM? I can do that, but obviously that's not good with an RPM based distro. As always, thank you!
On 7/2/09 1:19 PM, "Filipe Brandenburger" filbranden@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lanny,
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 16:05, Lanny Marcuslmmailinglists@gmail.com wrote:
Gary: The KompoZer web site says the .8 alpha4 version is much more stable on Linux than the current version,
Actually they say the 0.8 branch (not specifically alpha4 version) is more stable than the 0.7 branch.
but I don't see an SRPM available.
Indeed there is none for 0.8a4, but there is one for 0.8a3: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/kompozer/kompozer-0.8a3-fc10-... c.rpm
See all files here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kompozer/files/
OTOH, I believe building this from source might become very tricky, since it is based on Mozilla code I can only guess the nightmare of dependencies to get it done...
Speaking as a person who has built Firefox on my own before, the only hard part about building Mozilla is the balancing act between the required versions of gecko-sdk and cairo. Overall, I've had zero problems building it once I sorted out the exact releases it wants (this is why when on a newer distribution, I normally have two versions of cairo, gecko-sdk, and pango; the one the distro ships, and the one that older apps need).
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. It lacks a lot of stuff I'm used to in M$ FrontPage
It took my 15-year-old nephew about two rainy afternoons to learn XHTML and CSS. All those WYSIWYG tools will allow you to make websites in the sense that chickens fly and horses swim.
Niki
On 7/2/09, Niki Kovacs contact@kikinovak.net wrote:
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Looks like for the moment, KompoZer is the easiest thing for me to use on Linux. It lacks a lot of stuff I'm used to in M$ FrontPage
It took my 15-year-old nephew about two rainy afternoons to learn XHTML and CSS. All those WYSIWYG tools will allow you to make websites in the sense that chickens fly and horses swim.
Glad your nephew was able to learn that so quickly. I will begin learning..... You are very correct. When I was on a horse in a river recently, he was able to walk and didn't need to swim. You are more than correct about the early version of M$ FrontPage (2000) that I have. Bad code is what it produces, but it allowed me to produce a decent looking web site, very quickly.
On Thu, July 2, 2009 4:19 pm, Lanny Marcus wrote:
I will begin learning...
O'Reilly's "Head First HTML with CSS & XHTML" would not be a bad place to start: http://www.bestwebbuys.com/books/compare/isbn/059610197x
Marko