XFS is the most stable file system I've seen or used. I've seen it survive power failures and disk problems with out a problem. It is the ONLY file system I trust. It is stable, reliable, dependable, and practically bullet proof. I've been using XFS almost since it came into existence on SGI's (IRIX) and we've been using it under Linux for years too, also with out problems.
2009/12/7 Brent L. Bates blbates@vigyan.com
XFS is the most stable file system I've seen or used. I've seen itsurvive power failures and disk problems with out a problem. It is the ONLY file system I trust. It is stable, reliable, dependable, and practically bullet proof. I've been using XFS almost since it came into existence on SGI's (IRIX) and we've been using it under Linux for years too, also with out problems.
what other file systems you've used and how they compare to ext4? thnx
Brent L. Bates wrote:
XFS is the most stable file system I've seen or used. I've seen itsurvive power failures and disk problems with out a problem. It is the ONLY file system I trust. It is stable, reliable, dependable, and practically bullet proof. I've been using XFS almost since it came into existence on SGI's (IRIX) and we've been using it under Linux for years too, also with out problems.
I think the main source of reported problems was on 32-bit linux on distros that used 4k stacks - and perhaps there mostly where lvm/md/nfs layers were also involved.
-
Brent L. Bates -
cornel panceac -
Les Mikesell