I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers;
http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl
They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They tell me they are not finding libnetfilter_queue. Here is their message to me:
On 08/08/2013 02:03 PM, Miika Komu wrote:
Hi Robert,
a bug fix exists in the trunk, thanks to Juhani. Do you know why libnetfilter_queue is not available for CentOS? Do you know any CentOS maintainers?
On 13/03/13 15:00, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Here you go!
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: libipq and Fedora 18 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:45:13 -0600 From: Michal Jaegermann michal@harddata.com Reply-To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases test@lists.fedoraproject.org To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:07:14AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am working with the HIPL project: http://infrahip.net/ and I am the creator of the HIP protocol (see RFC 5201 and ID 5201-bis).
On past Fedora releases, HIPL has relied on libipq, but the package manager cannot find this in F18.
That is what you can find, for example, in Wikipedia: "libipq is a development library for iptables userspace packet queuing. Libipq provides an API for communicating with ip_queue.
Libipq has been deprecated in favour of the newer libnetfilter_queue in Linux kernel-2.6.14 onwards."
See also http://www.netfilter.org/projects/libnetfilter_queue/index.html
If you will try:
yum provides '*/libnetfilter_queue.so*'then packages libnetfilter_queue-1.0.2-1.fc18 and libnetfilter_queue-devel-1.0.2-1.fc18 will show up.
Michal-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is closer to Fedora 12, as I recall...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is closer to Fedora 12, as I recall...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Quite familiar with Centos taking what Redhat sends her. (Adapted from a line in 'The Wreak of the Edmund Fitzgerald')
I seem to recall that the switch started with F16 and complete with F17. So this makes it hard for maintainers to work with the old and new.
grumble.
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is closer to Fedora 12, as I recall...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Quite familiar with Centos taking what Redhat sends her. (Adapted from a line in 'The Wreak of the Edmund Fitzgerald')
I seem to recall that the switch started with F16 and complete with F17. So this makes it hard for maintainers to work with the old and new.
grumble.
Yeah, well, I'm upgrading a user's system to FC19, and I don't want to see your problems with trying to maintain that, um, alpha software.
The new updater is called fedup. *Boy*, did they choose the correct name. No info during the first part, after the reboot, whether you hit <esc> or one of the function keys, then it acts like it hangs, and, in fact, it *is* hung, as in power cycle the sucker, then it's coming up and *now* it installs all its packages....
And they call 19 Schroedinger's Cat. I agree, and they don't want to let you see if it's alive or dead....
mark
On 08/09/2013 04:06 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is closer to Fedora 12, as I recall...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Quite familiar with Centos taking what Redhat sends her. (Adapted from a line in 'The Wreak of the Edmund Fitzgerald')
I seem to recall that the switch started with F16 and complete with F17. So this makes it hard for maintainers to work with the old and new.
grumble.
Yeah, well, I'm upgrading a user's system to FC19, and I don't want to see your problems with trying to maintain that, um, alpha software.
The new updater is called fedup. *Boy*, did they choose the correct name. No info during the first part, after the reboot, whether you hit <esc> or one of the function keys, then it acts like it hangs, and, in fact, it *is* hung, as in power cycle the sucker, then it's coming up and *now* it installs all its packages....
And they call 19 Schroedinger's Cat. I agree, and they don't want to let you see if it's alive or dead....
mark
1. Make sure that SE Linux configuration is disabled (changing may require reboot) in /etc/selinux/config: SELINUX=disabled 2. Add a new file /etc/yum.repos.d/hipl.repo
...... ......
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2013 05:47 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/09/2013 04:06 PM, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/09/2013 08:48 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
Simply put, it's likely not in RHEL, either. CentOS is, essentially, a clone of RHEL, so if it's not in RHEL, it's not in CentOS.
Keep in mind, as well, that the latest Fedora releases are as closely related to the current RHEL/CentOS release as you and I. RHEL/CentOS6 is closer to Fedora 12, as I recall...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Quite familiar with Centos taking what Redhat sends her. (Adapted from a line in 'The Wreak of the Edmund Fitzgerald')
I seem to recall that the switch started with F16 and complete with F17. So this makes it hard for maintainers to work with the old and new.
grumble.
Yeah, well, I'm upgrading a user's system to FC19, and I don't want to see your problems with trying to maintain that, um, alpha software.
The new updater is called fedup. *Boy*, did they choose the correct name. No info during the first part, after the reboot, whether you hit <esc> or one of the function keys, then it acts like it hangs, and, in fact, it *is* hung, as in power cycle the sucker, then it's coming up and *now* it installs all its packages....
And they call 19 Schroedinger's Cat. I agree, and they don't want to let you see if it's alive or dead....
mark
- Make sure that SE Linux configuration is disabled (changing may require
reboot) in /etc/selinux/config: SELINUX=disabled 2. Add a new file /etc/yum.repos.d/hipl.repo
...... ......
Why would you require that SELinux be disabled?
-
Daniel J Walsh -
Ljubomir Ljubojevic -
m.roth＠5-cent.us -
Mike Burger -
Robert Moskowitz