Hi,
A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples:
5.0 5.1
tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10
The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does not contain the latest versions of some packages available for 5.0.
Any reason for this or should I just wait for the release of these updates?
Regards,
Heitor A. M. Cardozo
The redhat-release file in CentOS 5.1 is the same as in 5.0 I was wandering if this was deliberate.
Francesco
Francesco Camisa Direttore Amministrativo Policlinico San Marco via Zanotto 40 30173 Mestre-VE
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Hi,
A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples:
5.0 5.1
tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10
The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does not contain the latest versions of some packages available for 5.0.
Any reason for this or should I just wait for the release of these updates?
Regards,
Heitor A. M. Cardozo _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Francesco Camisa wrote:
The redhat-release file in CentOS 5.1 is the same as in 5.0 I was wandering if this was deliberate.
DO NOT HIJACK THREADS.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481
Ralph
YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW.
Next time maybe you should point that out nicely.
Francesco
Francesco Camisa Direttore Amministrativo Policlinico San Marco via Zanotto 40 30173 Mestre-VE
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Francesco Camisa wrote:
The redhat-release file in CentOS 5.1 is the same as in 5.0 I was wandering if this was deliberate.
DO NOT HIJACK THREADS.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2481
Ralph
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:34:33AM +0100, Francesco Camisa wrote:
YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW.
definitely not:
46965 Dec 04 Heitor A. M. Ca ( 23) [CentOS] Outdated packages on 5.1 46966 Dec 04 Francesco Camis ( 43) ##>[CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1 46967 s Dec 04 Ralph Angenendt ( 49) ##> 46968 Dec 04 Francesco Camis ( 38) ##>
Next time maybe you should point that out nicely.
Can we stop that now?
Tru
On Dec 4, 2007 2:34 AM, Francesco Camisa francesco.camisa@policlinicosanmarco.it wrote:
YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW.
Your message had References: and In-Reply-To: headers indicating that you started the "new" thread by doing a "Reply" operation on an existing message in another thread. The Subject alone does not a thread make.
When someone says "do not hijack threads" they mean "do not hit Reply and then modify the Subject." Sometimes they also/instead mean "don't change the topic without changing the subject" but usually it's the Reply thing.
Now that we've had our netiquette and jargon lessons for the day, let's go back on topic.
On Dec 4, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 2:34 AM, Francesco Camisa francesco.camisa@policlinicosanmarco.it wrote:
YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW.
Your message had References: and In-Reply-To: headers indicating that you started the "new" thread by doing a "Reply" operation on an existing message in another thread. The Subject alone does not a thread make.
When someone says "do not hijack threads" they mean "do not hit Reply and then modify the Subject." Sometimes they also/instead mean "don't change the topic without changing the subject" but usually it's the Reply thing.
Now that we've had our netiquette and jargon lessons for the day, let's go back on topic.
Someone buy this man a beer. ;-)
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10
The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does not contain the latest versions of some packages available for 5.0.
These updates will all make it to the 5.1/updates/ directory shortly.
- KB
-
Bart Schaefer -
Francesco Camisa -
Heitor A. M. Cardozo -
Karanbir Singh -
Ralph Angenendt -
Tru Huynh -
Von