On Thursday, 10 February 2005, at 20:59:43 (+0000), Lance Davis wrote:
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: multipart/signed, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 1.3K --]
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Feb 10 15:59:36 2005) --] gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: Signature made Thu Feb 10 15:59:41 2005 EST using DSA key ID 66DC8011 gpg: BAD signature from "Lance Davis lance@uklinux.net"
A BAD signature is worse than no signature at all. ;-)
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is signed --]
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable, Size: 0.1K --]
arrgh
[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - CentOS-3 i386 errata: Updated mod_python package fixes security issue --] [-- Type: message/rfc822, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.6K --]
<<<snip>>>
[-- End of signed data --]
Michael
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Thursday, 10 February 2005, at 20:59:43 (+0000), Lance Davis wrote:
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: multipart/signed, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 1.3K --]
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Feb 10 15:59:36 2005) --] gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: Signature made Thu Feb 10 15:59:41 2005 EST using DSA key ID 66DC8011 gpg: BAD signature from "Lance Davis lance@uklinux.net"
A BAD signature is worse than no signature at all. ;-)
Must be your client being stupid.
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The following data is signed --]
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable, Size: 0.1K --]
arrgh
[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - CentOS-3 i386 errata: Updated mod_python package fixes security issue --] [-- Type: message/rfc822, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.6K --]
<<<snip>>>
[-- End of signed data --]
Michael
On Thursday, 10 February 2005, at 21:07:51 (+0000), Lance Davis wrote:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Feb 10 15:59:36 2005) --] gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory! gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information gpg: Signature made Thu Feb 10 15:59:41 2005 EST using DSA key ID 66DC8011 gpg: BAD signature from "Lance Davis lance@uklinux.net"
A BAD signature is worse than no signature at all. ;-)
Must be your client being stupid.
My client is mutt, and it shells out to gpg itself. No stupidity possible.
And between mutt and Evolution, I'll point the Stupidity Finger at Evolution any day of the week. And twice on Sunday.
Michael
-
Lance Davis -
Michael Jennings