I have a Lexmark 2600 series printer but when I plug in the USB I get an alert saying the printer driver is missing and this appears in /var/log/messages:
May 8 19:33:17 localhost kernel: generic-usb 0003:093A:2510.0071: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.11 Mouse [PixArt USB Optical Mouse] on usb-0000:00:1d.0-1.7/input0 May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: new full speed USB device number 4 using ehci_hcd May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: New USB device found, idVendor=043d, idProduct=011d May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: Product: 2600 Series May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: Manufacturer: Lexmark May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: SerialNumber: XXXXXXXXX May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 4 if 1 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x043D pid 0x011D May 8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: generic-usb 0003:043D:011D.0072: hiddev96,hidraw1: USB HID v1.00 Device [Lexmark 2600 Series] on usb-0000:00:1a.0-1.6/input2 May 8 19:33:22 localhost udev-configure-printer: invalid or missing IEEE 1284 Device ID
Can anyone tell me what I need to install to get this working? Thanks, Steve
# rpm -qa | egrep -i "cups|foomatic|hplip" cups-pk-helper-0.0.4-12.el6.x86_64 hplip-libs-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64 foomatic-4.0.4-1.el6_1.1.x86_64 gutenprint-cups-5.2.5-2.el6.x86_64 foomatic-db-ppds-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch cups-libs-1.4.2-50.el6_4.4.x86_64 foomatic-db-filesystem-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch hplip-common-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64 foomatic-db-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch hplip-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64 hplip-gui-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64 cups-1.4.2-50.el6_4.4.x86_64
On 05/09/2013 03:29 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
Lexmark 2600
Download this driver : http://downloads.lexmark.com/downloads/cpd/lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i3... It is intended for Fedora 12, but should work for EL6 as well.
On Thu, 09 May 2013 10:49:01 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/09/2013 03:29 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
Lexmark 2600
Download this driver : http://downloads.lexmark.com/downloads/cpd/lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i3... It is intended for Fedora 12, but should work for EL6 as well.
Thanks for the link. I'll try it this weekend. Steve
On Thu, 9 May 2013 23:35:35 -0400 Steve Blackwell zephod@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 10:49:01 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/09/2013 03:29 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
Lexmark 2600
Download this driver : http://downloads.lexmark.com/downloads/cpd/lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i3... It is intended for Fedora 12, but should work for EL6 as well.
Thanks for the link. I'll try it this weekend. Steve
Well, no luck.
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh Verifying archive integrity... All good. Uncompressing nixstaller............................................................... Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory Error: Couldn't find any suitable frontend for your system
I contacted Lexmark's support and was told the usual "we don't support your OS" line. After I little back and forth I was given a 1-800 number for tech support who weren't available at the moment.
Steve
On Sat, 11 May 2013 15:18:50 -0400 Steve Blackwell wrote:
Well, no luck.
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
You'll apparently need to install some i386 libraries to make this work.
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 32bit routines installed. You're trying to install a 32bit piece of software.
You probably need to install glibc.i686 or determine if there's a x86_64 version of the package you're trying to install.
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400 Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org wrote:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 32bit routines installed. You're trying to install a 32bit piece of software.
You probably need to install glibc.i686 or determine if there's a x86_64 version of the package you're trying to install.
I installed the glibc.i686 rpm which fixed some of the errors. Now I get this:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh Verifying archive integrity... All good. Uncompressing nixstaller............................................................... Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... Error: Couldn't find any suitable frontend for your system
From looking at the installer script, a suitable frontend appears to be gtk, fltk or ncurs.
Is it OK to have both the x86_64 and i686 versions of any of these installed?
Thanks, Steve
On 05/12/2013 12:23 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400 Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org wrote:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 32bit routines installed. You're trying to install a 32bit piece of software.
You probably need to install glibc.i686 or determine if there's a x86_64 version of the package you're trying to install.
I installed the glibc.i686 rpm which fixed some of the errors. Now I get this:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh Verifying archive integrity... All good. Uncompressing nixstaller............................................................... Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... Error: Couldn't find any suitable frontend for your system
From looking at the installer script, a suitable frontend appears to be
gtk, fltk or ncurs.
Is it OK to have both the x86_64 and i686 versions of any of these installed?
Mostly only i686/i386 libraries are needed for 32-bit software to run on 64-bit system.
But first please give me exact product number of the printer. Is it X2610, X2650, X2695? It is very important to see it that driver is going to work for you.
On Sun, 12 May 2013 01:35:22 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/12/2013 12:23 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400 Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org wrote:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... ./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 32bit routines installed. You're trying to install a 32bit piece of software.
You probably need to install glibc.i686 or determine if there's a x86_64 version of the package you're trying to install.
I installed the glibc.i686 rpm which fixed some of the errors. Now I get this:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh Verifying archive integrity... All good. Uncompressing nixstaller............................................................... Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... Error: Couldn't find any suitable frontend for your system
From looking at the installer script, a suitable frontend appears to be
gtk, fltk or ncurs.
Is it OK to have both the x86_64 and i686 versions of any of these installed?
Mostly only i686/i386 libraries are needed for 32-bit software to run on 64-bit system.
But first please give me exact product number of the printer. Is it X2610, X2650, X2695? It is very important to see it that driver is going to work for you.
It's an X2670. I had it working under Fedora 12 on a 32bit system.
Steve
On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:23:47 -0400 Steve Blackwell zephod@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:05:35 -0400 Stephen Harris lists@spuddy.org wrote:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh
CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86...
./startupinstaller.sh: bin/linux/x86/libc.so.6/lzma-decode: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory
Your system is pure 64bit; no 32bit routines installed. You're trying to install a 32bit piece of software.
You probably need to install glibc.i686 or determine if there's a x86_64 version of the package you're trying to install.
I installed the glibc.i686 rpm which fixed some of the errors. Now I get this:
# ./lexmark-inkjet-08-driver-1.0-1.i386.rpm.sh Verifying archive integrity... All good. Uncompressing nixstaller............................................................... Collecting info for this system... Operating system: linux CPU Arch: x86_64 Warning: No installer for "x86_64" found, defaulting to x86... Error: Couldn't find any suitable frontend for your system
From looking at the installer script, a suitable frontend appears to be
gtk, fltk or ncurs.
Is it OK to have both the x86_64 and i686 versions of any of these installed?
I have installed some more i686 rpms and now I get the Lexmark installer to run. It still fails however and I get a message about not being able to load module "canberra-gtk-module". So...
# yum search canberra | grep i686 libcanberra-devel.i686 : Development Files for libcanberra Client Development libcanberra-gtk2.i686 : Gtk+ Bindings for libcanberra libcanberra.i686 : Portable Sound Event Library
# yum install libcanberra.i686 ...lots of dependent packages to install --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root cause is something else and multilib version checking is just pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.:
1. You have an upgrade for tcp_wrappers-libs which is missing some dependency that another package requires. Yum is trying to solve this by installing an older version of tcp_wrappers-libs of the different architecture. If you exclude the bad architecture yum will tell you what the root cause is (which package requires what). You can try redoing the upgrade with --exclude tcp_wrappers-libs.otherarch ... this should give you an error message showing the root cause of the problem.
2. You have multiple architectures of tcp_wrappers-libs installed, but yum can only see an upgrade for one of those arcitectures. If you don't want/need both architectures anymore then you can remove the one with the missing update and everything will work.
3. You have duplicate versions of tcp_wrappers-libs installed already. You can use "yum check" to get yum show these errors.
...you can also use --setopt=protected_multilib=false to remove this checking, however this is almost never the correct thing to do as something else is very likely to go wrong (often causing much more problems).
Protected multilib versions: tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.i686 != tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Steve
On 05/14/2013 03:16 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Give me output of "yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*, I got:
[root@kancelarija etc]# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Determining fastest mirrors Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 plc-os [root@kancelarija etc]#
maybe "yum update" or "yum update tcp_wrappers-libs.i686" will help?
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:26:14 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/14/2013 03:16 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Give me output of "yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*, I got:
[root@kancelarija etc]# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Determining fastest mirrors Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 plc-os [root@kancelarija etc]#
maybe "yum update" or "yum update tcp_wrappers-libs.i686" will help?
# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security No plugin match for: *priorities* Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu * centosplus: centos.netnitco.net * contrib: mirror.raystedman.net * epel: mirror.hiwaay.net * extras: mirror.beyondhosting.net * remi: remi-mirror.dedipower.com * rpmforge: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmforge-extras: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * updates: mirrors-pa.sioru.com Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.test @rpmforge-testing Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras
So the problem seems to be the fact that I have the test version from the rpmforge-testing repo installed. I've tried disabling that repo and doing an update but no luck. I've tried doing a yum update of the i686 version but yum says it's available but not installed. Doing a yum install give me the multi-repo error. Is there a way to replace one version with anothe?
Thanks, Steve
Steve
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:26:14 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/14/2013 03:16 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Give me output of "yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*, I got:
[root@kancelarija etc]# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Determining fastest mirrors Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 plc-os [root@kancelarija etc]#
maybe "yum update" or "yum update tcp_wrappers-libs.i686" will help?
# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security No plugin match for: *priorities* Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
- base: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu
- centosplus: centos.netnitco.net
- contrib: mirror.raystedman.net
- epel: mirror.hiwaay.net
- extras: mirror.beyondhosting.net
- remi: remi-mirror.dedipower.com
- rpmforge: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- rpmforge-extras: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- updates: mirrors-pa.sioru.com
Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.test @rpmforge-testing Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras
So the problem seems to be the fact that I have the test version from the rpmforge-testing repo installed. I've tried disabling that repo and doing an update but no luck. I've tried doing a yum update of the i686 version but yum says it's available but not installed. Doing a yum install give me the multi-repo error. Is there a way to replace one version with anothe?
try yum downgrade
On 05/16/2013 08:50 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:26:14 +0200 Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/14/2013 03:16 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Give me output of "yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*, I got:
[root@kancelarija etc]# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Determining fastest mirrors Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 plc-os [root@kancelarija etc]#
maybe "yum update" or "yum update tcp_wrappers-libs.i686" will help?
# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security No plugin match for: *priorities* Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
- base: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu
- centosplus: centos.netnitco.net
- contrib: mirror.raystedman.net
- epel: mirror.hiwaay.net
- extras: mirror.beyondhosting.net
- remi: remi-mirror.dedipower.com
- rpmforge: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- rpmforge-extras: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- updates: mirrors-pa.sioru.com
Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.test @rpmforge-testing Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras
So the problem seems to be the fact that I have the test version from the rpmforge-testing repo installed. I've tried disabling that repo and doing an update but no luck. I've tried doing a yum update of the i686 version but yum says it's available but not installed. Doing a yum install give me the multi-repo error. Is there a way to replace one version with anothe?
try yum downgrade
First thing to do is to permanently disable rpmforge-testing and rpmforge-extras repos with "enabled=0" in /etc/yum.repos.d/rpm...
Next, install priorities plugin: "yum install yum-plugin-priorities -y" and add "priorities=<number>" line for each repository in /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory, where number will be set to form a hierarchy:
base: 10 centosplus: 10 contrib: 10 epel: 20 extras: 15 remi: 30 rpmforge: 40 rpmforge-extras: 50 updates: 10
But you must be careful to add priorities= line to ANY NEW repository you add before you run yum, and give it number larger of 10 to preserve the main repositories and stability of your system. Any number >= 10 will mean that yum can replace main packages with ones from that repository!
Once you setup this, run "yum downgrade tcp_wrappers-libs" to solve your problem, "yum list installed | grep @rpmforge-testing" and "yum list installed | grep @rpmforge*" to see any replaced/installed packages from repoforge repository (not a good thing to replace packages from main CentOS repos).
List all installed packages from @rpmforge*:
yum list installed | grep @rpmforge* | awk '{print $1}'
Look/compare if installed package was replaced:
yum list <packages> --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*
I can not from top of my help adapt the list from first command to ditch everything after the last "." and then remove EOL. Maybe someone can solve it and provide a one-liner for you (and the rest of us :) ) to compare the list of installed packages with all available packages from provided list (first command).
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:22:35 +0200 Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/16/2013 08:50 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:26:14 +0200 Ljubojevic centos@plnet.rs wrote:
On 05/14/2013 03:16 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
I can't remove tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-57.el6.test.x86_64 because too much depends on it.
Give me output of "yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities*, I got:
[root@kancelarija etc]# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Determining fastest mirrors Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 @plc-os Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 plc-os tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 plc-os [root@kancelarija etc]#
maybe "yum update" or "yum update tcp_wrappers-libs.i686" will help?
# yum list tcp_wrappers-libs --showduplicates --disableplugin=*priorities* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security No plugin match for: *priorities* Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
- base: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu
- centosplus: centos.netnitco.net
- contrib: mirror.raystedman.net
- epel: mirror.hiwaay.net
- extras: mirror.beyondhosting.net
- remi: remi-mirror.dedipower.com
- rpmforge: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- rpmforge-extras: mirror.us.leaseweb.net
- updates: mirrors-pa.sioru.com
Installed Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.test @rpmforge-testing Available Packages tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6 base tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras
So the problem seems to be the fact that I have the test version from the rpmforge-testing repo installed. I've tried disabling that repo and doing an update but no luck. I've tried doing a yum update of the i686 version but yum says it's available but not installed. Doing a yum install give me the multi-repo error. Is there a way to replace one version with anothe?
try yum downgrade
First thing to do is to permanently disable rpmforge-testing and rpmforge-extras repos with "enabled=0" in /etc/yum.repos.d/rpm...
I had already permanently disabled the rf tesing repo but I do need the other rf repos because I use BackupPC which is not in the CentOS base.
I didn't go to the lengths that Ljubomir suggested but I downgraded the tcp_wrappers-libs then installed the i686 version and then I was able to install libcanberra.i686 and libcanberra-gtk2.i686 (why does a printer driver need a portable sound event library anyway?!?)
I was then able to run the Lexmark installer script but it still failed. Annoyingly, it pops up a "failed" dialog box that only has one button. When you click the button it kills the app and removes the text window containing the error messages which scrolled out of view.
I was just able to decipher the bottom half of the last error to figure out that I needed to install the i686 version of libusb.
Now I have a working printer again. I haven't tested the scanner yet but I expect it will work.
Thanks, Steve