Hello, is anyone experiencing this ? I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted) Hardware name: X8DTU-LN4+ Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 microcode serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support igb ioatdma dca i7core_edac edac_core sg ext4 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif usb_storage pata_acpi ata_generic ata_piix sata_mv dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Pid: 2241, comm: bulk.pl Not tainted 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81069997>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0 [<ffffffff810699ea>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff814eccc5>] ? thread_return+0x232/0x79d [<ffffffff810958e3>] ? __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1a3/0x460 [<ffffffff814ee5db>] ? do_nanosleep+0x8b/0xc0 [<ffffffff81095da4>] ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xc4/0x180 [<ffffffff81094b70>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x30 [<ffffffff81095bd4>] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff81095ed4>] ? sys_nanosleep+0x74/0x80 [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+
thank you
Rick
Am 22.01.2012 14:08, schrieb Riccardo Veraldi:
Hello, is anyone experiencing this ? I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted) Hardware name: X8DTU-LN4+ Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 microcode serio_raw i2c_i801 i2c_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support igb ioatdma dca i7core_edac edac_core sg ext4 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif usb_storage pata_acpi ata_generic ata_piix sata_mv dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Pid: 2241, comm: bulk.pl Not tainted 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81069997>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0 [<ffffffff810699ea>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff814eccc5>] ? thread_return+0x232/0x79d [<ffffffff810958e3>] ? __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1a3/0x460 [<ffffffff814ee5db>] ? do_nanosleep+0x8b/0xc0 [<ffffffff81095da4>] ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xc4/0x180 [<ffffffff81094b70>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x30 [<ffffffff81095bd4>] ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x14/0x20 [<ffffffff81095ed4>] ? sys_nanosleep+0x74/0x80 [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] ? system_call_fastpath+
thank you
Rick
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-January/122311.html
Alexander
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Riccardo Veraldi Riccardo.Veraldi@cnaf.infn.it wrote:
Hello, is anyone experiencing this ? I have a sympa process (bulk.pl) which triggers this bug:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d() (Not tainted) Hardware name: X8DTU-LN4+
You can find more info in this centos bug report:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5371
Akemi