Had anybody been successful in getting Pyzor to run on CentOS 6 64bit? I have it running fine on CentOS 6 32 bit, and I 'think' I did identical installs. But, from the command line I keep getting
Oct 6 13:36:00.659 [16065] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.205 [16065] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.206 [16065] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /usr/bin/pyzor check < /tmp/.spamassassin160655GZkVEtmp Oct 6 13:36:06.281 [16065] dbg: pyzor: [16168] finished: exit 1 Oct 6 13:36:06.282 [16065] dbg: pyzor: check failed: no response
And, yes the firewall port is open and I can ping pyzor.
Been Googling this for hours now.... lots of returns without any helpful info. And 'odd' that it is running fine on 32 bit. And of course, the 32 bit install is for internal use while the 64 bit system needs to go live to the public really fast!
On 10/6/2011 1:37 PM, John Hinton wrote:
Had anybody been successful in getting Pyzor to run on CentOS 6 64bit? I have it running fine on CentOS 6 32 bit, and I 'think' I did identical installs. But, from the command line I keep getting
Oct 6 13:36:00.659 [16065] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.205 [16065] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor Oct 6 13:36:06.206 [16065] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /usr/bin/pyzor check< /tmp/.spamassassin160655GZkVEtmp Oct 6 13:36:06.281 [16065] dbg: pyzor: [16168] finished: exit 1 Oct 6 13:36:06.282 [16065] dbg: pyzor: check failed: no response
And, yes the firewall port is open and I can ping pyzor.
Been Googling this for hours now.... lots of returns without any helpful info. And 'odd' that it is running fine on 32 bit. And of course, the 32 bit install is for internal use while the 64 bit system needs to go live to the public really fast!
OK, so I'm an idiot!!! arrgh! I started comparing every file and every directory for all of the anti-spam stuff and guess what I found? On the 64bit system sample-spam.txt had 0 bytes. Well, I suppose everything was working just as it should have been. That file on the 32 bit system has a date of March 16 2010, so I didn't put that text in there. Anyway, after adding in the spam text on the 64 bit system... it all works.
Why is it so often that the most obvious is the hardest to find? And why is this a 0 byte file instead of just not being there at all?
On the 32bit system, spamassassin was installed from base. On the 64bit system, spamassassin was installed from anaconda during full server installation.