Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible?
I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest drive or is there anyway it will use all of both drives?
Does it have to be a perfect block/byte balance across drives? (I'm assuming yes?)
Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible?
I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest drive or is there anyway it will use all of both drives?
Does it have to be a perfect block/byte balance across drives? (I'm assuming yes?)
Not sure... but if so, why not just partition the larger to have one that's the same size as the smaller?
mark
On 05/19/2010 10:50 AM, James Bensley wrote:
Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible?
I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest drive or is there anyway it will use all of both drives?
Does it have to be a perfect block/byte balance across drives? (I'm assuming yes?)
In general, RAID0 will only size to the smallest volume. If your goal is just to make the largest volume out of multiple smaller volumes, use LVM instead. If you specifically want the performance enhancement of RAID0's striping you will have to live with it sizing to the smallest drive.
On May 19, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Benjamin Franz jfranz@freerun.com wrote:
On 05/19/2010 10:50 AM, James Bensley wrote:
Does anyone know if using unequal drives in a RAID 0 is possible?
I was looking to set up a software stripe but if I have two volumes of unequal size I wish to stripe over, will the OS try and work around this by say only using as much space as is available on the smallest drive or is there anyway it will use all of both drives?
Does it have to be a perfect block/byte balance across drives? (I'm assuming yes?)
In general, RAID0 will only size to the smallest volume. If your goal is just to make the largest volume out of multiple smaller volumes, use LVM instead. If you specifically want the performance enhancement of RAID0's striping you will have to live with it sizing to the smallest drive.
Actually using LVM you can do both!
If you create the LV over two PVs, one bigger then the other, provide a size greater then the smaller can fit (size/2 > smaller disk free space) with an interleave of 2 it will put the remaining allocations sequentially on the bigger drive. Of course not ideal, but possible.
-Ross
-
Benjamin Franz -
James Bensley -
m.roth＠5-cent.us -
Ross Walker