Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Regards,
Le 27/07/2017 à 19:25, wwp a écrit :
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Usually, I install CentOS 7 with KDE on all desktop computers, mine and those of my clients. This is my "standard" desktop installation.
https://blog.microlinux.fr/poste-de-travail-centos-7/
On more recent hardware, I usually try to run a kernel from ELRepo, either kernel-lt or kernel-ml. One the repo is configured:
# yum --enablerepo=elrepo-kernel install kernel-{lt,ml}
I everything else fails (which happened recently on some weird el cheapo laptop from a friend), I'll install KDE neon, which is a healthy mix of bleeding edge and stable. This is a "least evil" solution, but it actually works nicely.
https://blog.microlinux.fr/neon-asus/
Cheers,
Niki
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:51:07 +0200 Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr wrote:
Le 27/07/2017 à 19:25, wwp a écrit :
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Usually, I install CentOS 7 with KDE on all desktop computers, mine and those of my clients. This is my "standard" desktop installation.
https://blog.microlinux.fr/poste-de-travail-centos-7/
On more recent hardware, I usually try to run a kernel from ELRepo, either kernel-lt or kernel-ml. One the repo is configured:
# yum --enablerepo=elrepo-kernel install kernel-{lt,ml}
[snip]
I would like to do that, but the live CD doesn't even boot, unknown hardware and that's the point. I thought I could find a respin of the DVD or Live CD w/ a recent kernel in.
Regards,
Le 27/07/2017 à 20:01, wwp a écrit :
I would like to do that, but the live CD doesn't even boot, unknown hardware and that's the point. I thought I could find a respin of the DVD or Live CD w/ a recent kernel in.
Can you boot the installation DVD? Does the installer come up? If not, can you use the text-mode installer?
Niki
Hello Nicolas,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:05:17 +0200 Nicolas Kovacs info@microlinux.fr wrote:
Le 27/07/2017 à 20:01, wwp a écrit :
I would like to do that, but the live CD doesn't even boot, unknown hardware and that's the point. I thought I could find a respin of the DVD or Live CD w/ a recent kernel in.
Can you boot the installation DVD? Does the installer come up? If not, can you use the text-mode installer?
Installing from the DVD does work! I was trying from the Live CD, no luck.
Regards,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:25:25PM +0200, wwp wrote:
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What sense of the word "stable" are you looking for?
Hello Matthew,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:27:47 -0400 Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:25:25PM +0200, wwp wrote:
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What sense of the word "stable" are you looking for?
It's a good question. When I wrote that, I was wondering what do I mean saying "stable". Provided that it could be a top-recent kernel or a respin, I guess that the stable concept is potentially gone.
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
Regards,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense.
Did you already try current Centos? If yes what was the problem? Why it did not work?
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense.
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello vychytraly,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:02:18 +0200 "vychytraly ." vychytraly@gmail.com wrote:
Did you already try current Centos? If yes what was the problem? Why it did not work?
It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
Regards,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense.
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
So it is very possible that full hardware support for your hardware could show up in a 3.10 kernel (in fact, I would expect that this would happen, but it might not happen quickly). As you found out, experimental kernels and non-distribution kernels can freak out software packages, such as VMware Workstation, that only work with certain kernels and are expecting a particular kernel version and ABI for EL7. I've tried out a few non-standard kernels before, and if you rely on packages that depend upon the distribution default kernel version (as I do with kmod-nvidia from ELrepo!) that breakage can be swift, and can derail you in a hurry, causing you to go down a rabbit hole very quickly. So be prepared and keep your eyes open for these issues.
In some circles, the back-porting of features into old kernels is controversial; but that is a business decision made as part of the EL development and is not likely to change any time soon. YMMV.
On 08/02/2017 09:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
It might work in the RHEL 7.4 kernel .. I'll get that onto buildlogs for testing while I am working on the CentOS Linux 7 upgrade builds.
And yes, people do need to understand that Red Hat backports newer firmware and drivers to the older kernels. There are plenty of 4.x kernel things backported. So, as you correctly pointed out, you can't treat the Red Hat 3.10.x kernels like kernel.org 3.10.x kernels.
<snip>
On 02/08/17 16:18, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/02/2017 09:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
It might work in the RHEL 7.4 kernel .. I'll get that onto buildlogs for testing while I am working on the CentOS Linux 7 upgrade builds.
And yes, people do need to understand that Red Hat backports newer firmware and drivers to the older kernels. There are plenty of 4.x kernel things backported. So, as you correctly pointed out, you can't treat the Red Hat 3.10.x kernels like kernel.org 3.10.x kernels.
<snip>
Indeed, Lamar and Johnny are correct. For example, the wireless driver stack from kernel-4.11 has just showed up in the RHEL-7.4 kernel released yesterday.
Further, I would encourage anyone to file RFEs upstream with Red Hat for support to be added for any currently unsupported hardware. If Red Hat don't know you want support for it, it won't get added. If you don't ask, you won't get.
Whilst you are waiting on Red Hat to backport support into the distro kernel, don't forget elrepo.org also specialise in backporting individual device drivers which can provide an invaluable stopgap allowing the distro kernel to continue to be used until such time as the hardware is natively supported. For example, I recently built an updated i2c-i801 el7 driver adding backported support from kernel-4.4 for Braswell and Wildcat Point ICH's following an RFE from a user.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 08/02/2017 09:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
<snip>
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current
Just as a point of information, CentOS 6 runs on a Knights Landing architecture, though 7.x makes more features available. And that was about a year ago....
mark
Hello,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:55:14 -0400 Lamar Owen lowen@pari.edu wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
So it is very possible that full hardware support for your hardware could show up in a 3.10 kernel (in fact, I would expect that this would happen, but it might not happen quickly). As you found out, experimental kernels and non-distribution kernels can freak out software packages, such as VMware Workstation, that only work with certain kernels and are expecting a particular kernel version and ABI for EL7. I've tried out a few non-standard kernels before, and if you rely on packages that depend upon the distribution default kernel version (as I do with kmod-nvidia from ELrepo!) that breakage can be swift, and can derail you in a hurry, causing you to go down a rabbit hole very quickly. So be prepared and keep your eyes open for these issues.
In some circles, the back-porting of features into old kernels is controversial; but that is a business decision made as part of the EL development and is not likely to change any time soon. YMMV.
Thanks for this clear explanation, Lamar. I'll surely keep an eye on further kernel updates (and CentOS 7.4).
Regards,
On 08/02/2017 10:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
So it is very possible that full hardware support for your hardware could show up in a 3.10 kernel (in fact, I would expect that this would happen, but it might not happen quickly). As you found out, experimental kernels and non-distribution kernels can freak out software packages, such as VMware Workstation, that only work with certain kernels and are expecting a particular kernel version and ABI for EL7. I've tried out a few non-standard kernels before, and if you rely on packages that depend upon the distribution default kernel version (as I do with kmod-nvidia from ELrepo!) that breakage can be swift, and can derail you in a hurry, causing you to go down a rabbit hole very quickly. So be prepared and keep your eyes open for these issues.
In some circles, the back-porting of features into old kernels is controversial; but that is a business decision made as part of the EL development and is not likely to change any time soon. YMMV. _______________________________________________
I missed some of the responses but have you tried kernel-ml for RHEL 7 yet? See http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
Mike
Hello Mike,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:19:30 -0400 "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" sysop@w1nr.net wrote:
On 08/02/2017 10:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/27/2017 04:16 PM, wwp wrote:
... It is as simple as unknown hardware at boot up, it's a well known issue w/ *Lake hardware (modern hardware) that kernel 3.x cannot handle. CentOS7 has a kernel which is simply not modern, unable to handle lots of computers sold currently.
That said, there might be a way to boot, but nothing trivial and nothing at all I could find on the Internet, everytime it's kernel 4.3/4.10 minimum required.
...
While I know that Johnny has provided the experimental kernel (thanks, Johnny) I would like to just briefly address this idea that the C7 kernel is 'obviously' not going to work because 'is 3.x and must have 4.x.'
In EL-land, kernel versions are effectively meaningless, since features, hardware support, bugfixes, security fixes, etc are back-ported into the 'old and not modern' 3.10 kernel (for EL7) by competent developers at Red Hat. An EL 3.10 kernel, such as the current 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 one, may have hardware support back-ported from a 4.x kernel that doesn't exist in the vanilla kernel.org kernel (I'm almost certain it does, but I'm not going to take the time to get details).
So it is very possible that full hardware support for your hardware could show up in a 3.10 kernel (in fact, I would expect that this would happen, but it might not happen quickly). As you found out, experimental kernels and non-distribution kernels can freak out software packages, such as VMware Workstation, that only work with certain kernels and are expecting a particular kernel version and ABI for EL7. I've tried out a few non-standard kernels before, and if you rely on packages that depend upon the distribution default kernel version (as I do with kmod-nvidia from ELrepo!) that breakage can be swift, and can derail you in a hurry, causing you to go down a rabbit hole very quickly. So be prepared and keep your eyes open for these issues.
In some circles, the back-porting of features into old kernels is controversial; but that is a business decision made as part of the EL development and is not likely to change any time soon. YMMV. _______________________________________________
I missed some of the responses but have you tried kernel-ml for RHEL 7 yet? See http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
In that time, no, but since then, yes. I replied some detail elsewhere to this thread. More to come!
Regards,
On Thu, July 27, 2017 3:02 pm, vychytraly . wrote:
Did you already try current Centos? If yes what was the problem? Why it did not work?
I would first ask kindly: please, do not to post.
I would second that. Namely, I had quite a few Dell laptops, all of them that were configured and purchased from Dell as Linux laptops (Dell installs latest Ubintu on them), were easily reinstalled with latest CentOS, and I never had trouble doing that.
To OP: Once you do clean fresh installation of latest CentOS 7, and update everything, please, report problems you have encountered. This list has greatest experts: I know, I got help here multiple times.
Good luck!
Valeri
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all
options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case â and I freely admit I have some bias here â I highly
recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI
compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month
life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense. --
Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hello Matthew,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:59:35 -0400 Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense.
Right, I'm currently digging that way, struggling a bit w/ the way I write the F26 ISO to a USB flashdrive (I'll succeed tomorrow, found better howtos to get rid of unetbootin issues).
Fedora could be stable enough even if not a standard/reference in industry at all (which sticks to RH releases), I would have loved a CentOS because it is way more compliant to my "corporate" needs (LTS), but a Fedora could be do it, if it really does it, at least until CentOS8 is out.
Regards,
Maybe CentOS 7.4 would have backported compatibility for your hardware. I had similar issues with Intel GPU not being recognized, which was solved by "i915 preliminary hw support enabled" method. Try to have a look on that.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:24 PM, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Matthew,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:59:35 -0400 Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all options that do work, so let's forget about "stable".
In that case — and I freely admit I have some bias here — I highly recommend Fedora. It's not stable in the sense of strict ABI compliance, although we try to minimize disruption within the 13-month life of a release, but it is stable in the "does not crash" sense.
Right, I'm currently digging that way, struggling a bit w/ the way I write the F26 ISO to a USB flashdrive (I'll succeed tomorrow, found better howtos to get rid of unetbootin issues).
Fedora could be stable enough even if not a standard/reference in industry at all (which sticks to RH releases), I would have loved a CentOS because it is way more compliant to my "corporate" needs (LTS), but a Fedora could be do it, if it really does it, at least until CentOS8 is out.
Regards,
-- wwp
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 27.07.2017 um 22:48 schrieb vychytraly . vychytraly@gmail.com:
Maybe CentOS 7.4 would have backported compatibility for your hardware. I had similar issues with Intel GPU not being recognized, which was solved by "i915 preliminary hw support enabled" method. Try to have a look on that.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Bet... https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/7.4_Release_Notes/new_features_hardware_enablement.html
Well, the only thing that catches my eye here is the support for newer Intel PCHs.
Skylake (Purley) servers exist, so I would assume that RHEL would need to support these chipsets.
Wireless, GPUs etc - that’s something different.
Of course, there’s always SLES (or SLED, in the OPs case), which has a somewhat more recent kernel, AFAIK - if we’re playing „Anything but Ubuntu“. ;-)
The above beta came out in May. So I’d hazard a guess and say it’ll be late autumn before we see a release and I’d hope for a pre-christmas CentOS 7.4 release….
Rainer
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:24:29PM +0200, wwp wrote:
Right, I'm currently digging that way, struggling a bit w/ the way I write the F26 ISO to a USB flashdrive (I'll succeed tomorrow, found better howtos to get rid of unetbootin issues).
I recommend using Fedora Media Writer https://github.com/MartinBriza/MediaWriter/releases over unetbootin; our QA team reports that unetbootin just isn't guaranteed to do the right thing.
Le 27/07/2017 à 22:24, wwp a écrit :
Fedora could be stable enough even if not a standard/reference in industry at all (which sticks to RH releases), I would have loved a CentOS because it is way more compliant to my "corporate" needs (LTS)
This is why I appreciate KDE neon (https://neon.kde.org/) as a "lesser evil" fallback solution on hardware that does not support CentOS. Its base is LTS, hardware support is improved between minor releases. The system is stable (e. g. usable), and its support is way longer than Fedora.
Niki
wwp wrote:
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Hey, I just tried googling, and I cannot find a 9590, only 9550. You sure of that?
Oh, and will it boot without UEFI from a flash drive?
mark
Hello m.roth@5-cent.us,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:25:49 -0400 m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
wwp wrote:
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Hey, I just tried googling, and I cannot find a 9590, only 9550. You sure of that?
It's simply a typo: 9560. I've read of 9550 successful stories, but none of 9560 yet.
Oh, and will it boot without UEFI from a flash drive?
It's UEFI, I get the boot menu, but it won't go further.
Regards,
I would go with Fedora or OpenSUSE latest if you want RH like on that hardware. There is nothing that unstable about them other than losing updates and maintenance after 2 years and having to upgrade.
Another choice is to run Virtualbox on the Windows that shipped with the laptop and run a CentOS 7 virtual guest.
If you REALLY need RHEL (CentOS) running on the hardware I would return the XPS and get a Lattitude or Precision laptop. They have much better Linux support as they tend to be more stability oriented rather than latest and greatest hardware.
Mike
On 07/27/2017 01:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Regards,
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
And, if Ubuntu isn't pariah, even it's LTS has a reasonably current kernel. However, the "Debian way" (Debian, Ubuntu, others) is enough different than the "Red Hat way" (RHEL, CentOS, SuSE more or less) that, if it's important to you, stick with the RPM-based options.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" sysop@w1nr.net To: "centos" centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 4:01:18 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] What RH-like on a Dell XPS 15 (9590)?
I would go with Fedora or OpenSUSE latest if you want RH like on that hardware. There is nothing that unstable about them other than losing updates and maintenance after 2 years and having to upgrade.
Another choice is to run Virtualbox on the Windows that shipped with the laptop and run a CentOS 7 virtual guest.
If you REALLY need RHEL (CentOS) running on the hardware I would return the XPS and get a Lattitude or Precision laptop. They have much better Linux support as they tend to be more stability oriented rather than latest and greatest hardware.
Mike
On 07/27/2017 01:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Regards,
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Mike,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:01:18 -0400 "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" sysop@w1nr.net wrote:
I would go with Fedora or OpenSUSE latest if you want RH like on that hardware. There is nothing that unstable about them other than losing updates and maintenance after 2 years and having to upgrade.
Another choice is to run Virtualbox on the Windows that shipped with the laptop and run a CentOS 7 virtual guest.
If you REALLY need RHEL (CentOS) running on the hardware I would return the XPS and get a Lattitude or Precision laptop. They have much better Linux support as they tend to be more stability oriented rather than latest and greatest hardware.
As a try, I could install a Fedora 26 - installation and runtime went fine, apparently for everything (cpu, disk, video, wifi, bluetooth, sound..). Bad luck, once back to Windows (it's a dual boot), the UEFI config lost the F26 entry, I'm good to reinstall and find how to prevent Windows to override the UEFI config. Also digging other directions..
Regards,
On 07/27/2017 01:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
Regards,
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 27.07.2017 um 19:25 schrieb wwp subscript@free.fr:
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
as addition to the other comments I would suggest to report it on RH's bugzilla. So they get awareness ...
-- LF
I have a Dell XPS 13 (9360) with Fedora 26 installed. Very happy with it.
UEFI boot from flash drive works out of the box.
For install I needed to change the drive settings in the BIOS from the default of RAID (what ever that means on a laptop) to AHCI. No need to turn off secure boot.
If you want to use a DisplayLink USB display adaptor like the D3100 (commonly sold with this laptop), you might want to checkout https://github.com/displaylink-rpm. This will require either you to turn off secure boot or to sign the displaylink modules after they are installed. Signing is not that hard, but is a extra step that you have to look after.
Cheers,
Kal
Hello Kahlil,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:35:57 +1000 Kahlil Hodgson kahlil.hodgson@dp.exchange wrote:
I have a Dell XPS 13 (9360) with Fedora 26 installed. Very happy with it.
UEFI boot from flash drive works out of the box.
For install I needed to change the drive settings in the BIOS from the default of RAID (what ever that means on a laptop) to AHCI. No need to turn off secure boot.
Thanks!
I read that elsewhere, that's what I did too.
I could install F26 and run it, that will probably be my option if I definitely fail w/ CentOS7+whatever and once I solved the UEFI config issue (Windows overrides it everytime).
If you want to use a DisplayLink USB display adaptor like the D3100 (commonly sold with this laptop), you might want to checkout https://github.com/displaylink-rpm. This will require either you to turn off secure boot or to sign the displaylink modules after they are installed. Signing is not that hard, but is a extra step that you have to look after.
I'll probably use a WD15 Dock, apparently that works out of the box in Linux too, provided that the dock firmware is up-to-date.
Regards,
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
Regards,
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Regards,
On 07/28/2017 07:51 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote:
Hello there,
I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its kernel can't run on this hardware.
What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all.
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Once I get a working ISO that installs, I'll post a link.
You would have to set up the experimental repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ to get kernel updates, and those would be RPM only.
In fact, I have a live ISO now that installs (in KVM) .. but I still need to make sure this kernel updates correctly from the experimental repo.
The kernel (and linux-firmware) rpms are unsigned, but should upgrade from the experimental repo for future upgrades and those are signed.
So, I should have something installable sometime in the next few hours that you can try.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On 07/28/2017 08:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:51 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote: > Hello there, > > > I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable > GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its > kernel can't run on this hardware. > > What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless > it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ > more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not > willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all. > >
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Once I get a working ISO that installs, I'll post a link.
You would have to set up the experimental repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ to get kernel updates, and those would be RPM only.
In fact, I have a live ISO now that installs (in KVM) .. but I still need to make sure this kernel updates correctly from the experimental repo.
The kernel (and linux-firmware) rpms are unsigned, but should upgrade from the experimental repo for future upgrades and those are signed.
So, I should have something installable sometime in the next few hours that you can try.
OK .. I just pushed this ISO to the master mirror:
CentOS-7-x86_64-LiveGnome-1707-exp.iso (sha256sum): f60d806f513f337acd09c5cf4a2ec3c735ba82519798d07096992916fc4cf271
Once it makes it to the mirrors, it can be downloaded via this link:
https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-LiveGnome-...
I also tested this on a physical machine (t520 thinkpad) , as well as an install on a KVM VM, and it installs fine both places.
After install and reboot, add in the experimental.repo file via this link (bottom of the page):
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/i386
Run a 'yum upgrade', reboot and you should be set.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:58:16 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:51 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote: > Hello there, > > > I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable > GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its > kernel can't run on this hardware. > > What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless > it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ > more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not > willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all. > >
I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Once I get a working ISO that installs, I'll post a link.
You would have to set up the experimental repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ to get kernel updates, and those would be RPM only.
In fact, I have a live ISO now that installs (in KVM) .. but I still need to make sure this kernel updates correctly from the experimental repo.
The kernel (and linux-firmware) rpms are unsigned, but should upgrade from the experimental repo for future upgrades and those are signed.
So, I should have something installable sometime in the next few hours that you can try.
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is): - bluetooth not working - HDMI ouput -> nothing - dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle - no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
Regards,
On 07/28/2017 10:26 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:58:16 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:51 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote: >> Hello there, >> >> >> I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable >> GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its >> kernel can't run on this hardware. >> >> What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless >> it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ >> more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not >> willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all. >> >> > > I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I > can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs.
4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is.
It lives here:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/
(currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Once I get a working ISO that installs, I'll post a link.
You would have to set up the experimental repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ to get kernel updates, and those would be RPM only.
In fact, I have a live ISO now that installs (in KVM) .. but I still need to make sure this kernel updates correctly from the experimental repo.
The kernel (and linux-firmware) rpms are unsigned, but should upgrade from the experimental repo for future upgrades and those are signed.
So, I should have something installable sometime in the next few hours that you can try.
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted, and one in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they both should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 10:26 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:58:16 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:51 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:14:49 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 07:04 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 05:44:33 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 05:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/27/2017 12:25 PM, wwp wrote: >>> Hello there, >>> >>> >>> I've just got a Dell XPS 15 (9590) at work and need to set up a stable >>> GNU/Linux system on it. I thought of CentOS7, but.. obviously its >>> kernel can't run on this hardware. >>> >>> What would you recommend? Waiting for CentOS8 is not an option unless >>> it's a question of few weeks. Are there respins of the CentOS7 DVDs w/ >>> more top-recent kernels? I'm know of Fedora 26 or course, and not >>> willing to switch to Ubuntu 16.10 at all. >>> >>> >> >> I have an experimental 4.9.x kernel stream for x86_64. Let me see if I >> can create a live-dvd that boots with that kernel and installs. > > 4.9 kernel tree for CentOS-7 that is. > > It lives here: > > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/x86_64/ > > (currently pushing a 4.9.39 kernel there)
Thanks, if I succeed in installing a C7, I'll make use of it and provide feedback.
hmmm .. the live ISO fails to boot .. there is not squashfs module .. let me see if I can fix that.
Where could I get an ISO (once fixed), I only saw RPMs at the link you pasted? Or do I have to assemble myself in some way?
Once I get a working ISO that installs, I'll post a link.
You would have to set up the experimental repo in /etc/yum.repos.d/ to get kernel updates, and those would be RPM only.
In fact, I have a live ISO now that installs (in KVM) .. but I still need to make sure this kernel updates correctly from the experimental repo.
The kernel (and linux-firmware) rpms are unsigned, but should upgrade from the experimental repo for future upgrades and those are signed.
So, I should have something installable sometime in the next few hours that you can try.
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted, and one in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they both should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I see. It's true that secure boot is ON here. I'll turn it off, and also see your other email. Thanks a bunch!
Regards,
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted, and one in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they both should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings: - Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key, - dual screen support using the HDMI port, and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
Regards,
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted, and one in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they both should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541). I have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no luck using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra firmware, see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I immediately get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted, and one in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they both should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541). I have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply: - suspend works - hibernate works This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
On August 2, 2017 3:18:29 AM CDT, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes
johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no
luck
using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra
firmware,
see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I
immediately
get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted,
and one
in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they
both
should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541).
I
have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major
issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply:
- suspend works
- hibernate works
This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
What about now that you have it booted and working except for VMWare install the mainline 4.x kernel that is available? Take precautionary steps to make sure that will work, hence, back up any data and, if need be, configs.
Would that work?
Regards,
Lance
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:53:45 -0500 Lance Lassetter lancelassetter@gmail.com wrote:
On August 2, 2017 3:18:29 AM CDT, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes
johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no
luck
using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive).
Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is):
- bluetooth not working
- HDMI ouput -> nothing
- dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle
- no suspend/hibernate
I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra
firmware,
see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And compare this to what Fedora 26 provides..
(*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I
immediately
get: error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature error: you need to load the kernel first
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted,
and one
in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they
both
should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541).
I
have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major
issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply:
- suspend works
- hibernate works
This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
What about now that you have it booted and working except for VMWare install the mainline 4.x kernel that is available? Take precautionary steps to make sure that will work, hence, back up any data and, if need be, configs.
Would that work?
It didn't. I tried to boot using kernel-ml-4.12.4-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 but it hangs either before or right after the graphical login. No visual tip, system is not responsive until I shutdown the computer. /var/log/message is full of kernel info about failures in a loop that I cannot interpret, see:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ
Regards,
Ok you in Grub press tab and then add „3“ after the initrd entry …. quiet…“
yum remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
And see if X11 come up with standard frambuffer…
Disable nouveau complete from kernel if the upper not helps.
nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf
blacklist nouveau
Am 04.08.2017 um 12:52 schrieb wwp subscript@free.fr:
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:53:45 -0500 Lance Lassetter <lancelassetter@gmail.com mailto:lancelassetter@gmail.com> wrote:
On August 2, 2017 3:18:29 AM CDT, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes
johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip]
> I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no
luck
> using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive). > > Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is): > - bluetooth not working > - HDMI ouput -> nothing > - dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle > - no suspend/hibernate > > I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra
firmware,
> see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And > compare this to what Fedora 26 provides.. > > (*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after > configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I
immediately
> get: > error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature > error: you need to load the kernel first >
There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted,
and one
in the experimental repo.
Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they
both
should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541).
I
have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major
issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply:
- suspend works
- hibernate works
This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
What about now that you have it booted and working except for VMWare install the mainline 4.x kernel that is available? Take precautionary steps to make sure that will work, hence, back up any data and, if need be, configs.
Would that work?
It didn't. I tried to boot using kernel-ml-4.12.4-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 but it hangs either before or right after the graphical login. No visual tip, system is not responsive until I shutdown the computer. /var/log/message is full of kernel info about failures in a loop that I cannot interpret, see:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ
Regards,
-- wwp _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
If you wanne use the opensource version from nvidia can test my private driver stack
[cms4all-kernel] name=cms4all-kernel baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/kernel gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
Same as ml + some AMD flags and
[cms4all-drivers] name=cms4all-drivers baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/drivers/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/drivers gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
newer linux drivers from libdrm and x11. Optional
[cms4all-mesa] name=cms4all-mesa baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/mesa gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
Sincerely
Andy
Am Freitag, den 04.08.2017, 13:24 +0200 schrieb Andreas Benzler:
Ok you in Grub press tab and then add „3“ after the initrd entry …. quiet…“
yum remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
And see if X11 come up with standard frambuffer…
Disable nouveau complete from kernel if the upper not helps.
nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf
blacklist nouveau
Am 04.08.2017 um 12:52 schrieb wwp subscript@free.fr:
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:53:45 -0500 Lance Lassetter <lancelassetter@gmail.com mailto:lancelassetter@gmail.com> wrote:
On August 2, 2017 3:18:29 AM CDT, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes
johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip] >> I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no
luck
>> using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive). >> >> Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is): >> - bluetooth not working >> - HDMI ouput -> nothing >> - dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle >> - no suspend/hibernate >> >> I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra
firmware,
>> see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And >> compare this to what Fedora 26 provides.. >> >> (*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after >> configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I
immediately
>> get: >> error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature >> error: you need to load the kernel first >> > > There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted,
and one
> in the experimental repo. > > Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they
both
> should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541).
I
have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major
issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply:
- suspend works
- hibernate works
This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
What about now that you have it booted and working except for VMWare install the mainline 4.x kernel that is available? Take precautionary steps to make sure that will work, hence, back up any data and, if need be, configs.
Would that work?
It didn't. I tried to boot using kernel-ml-4.12.4-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 but it hangs either before or right after the graphical login. No visual tip, system is not responsive until I shutdown the computer. /var/log/message is full of kernel info about failures in a loop that I cannot interpret, see:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ
Regards,
-- wwp _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Andy,
On Fri, 04 Aug 2017 14:55:33 +0200 Andreas Benzler andreas@benzlerweb.de wrote:
If you wanne use the opensource version from nvidia can test my private driver stack
[cms4all-kernel] name=cms4all-kernel baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/kernel gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
Same as ml + some AMD flags and
[cms4all-drivers] name=cms4all-drivers baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/drivers/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/drivers gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
newer linux drivers from libdrm and x11. Optional
[cms4all-mesa] name=cms4all-mesa baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/mesa gpgcheck=0 enabled=1
I thought it was an Intel-inside thing ;-), but obviously no, or not only:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 591b (rev 04) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Dell Device 07be Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 131 Memory at eb000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] Memory at 80000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] I/O ports at f000 [size=64] [virtual] Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [40] Vendor Specific Information: Len=0c <?> Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [ac] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit- Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [100] Process Address Space ID (PASID) Capabilities: [200] Address Translation Service (ATS) Capabilities: [300] Page Request Interface (PRI) Kernel driver in use: i915 Kernel modules: i915
01:00.0 3D controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c8d (rev a1) Subsystem: Dell Device 07be Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 Memory at ec000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] Memory at c0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=32M] I/O ports at e000 [size=128] Expansion ROM at ed000000 [disabled] [size=512K] Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [250] Latency Tolerance Reporting Capabilities: [258] L1 PM Substates Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting <?> Capabilities: [420] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [600] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=024 <?> Capabilities: [900] #19 Kernel modules: nouveau
I must admit that this is new to me! I'm not familiar w/ laptops w/ 2 devices like that. Now I understand why under Windows, Dell has installed both Intel and NVidia software. Could anyone explain why such hardware configuration?
I'll try disabling nouveau as soon as I can and let you know, but also try the opensource version from nvidia. Thanks for both suggestions!
Regards,
I must admit that this is new to me! I'm not familiar w/ laptops w/ 2
devices like that. Now I
understand why under Windows, Dell has installed both Intel and NVidia
software.
Could anyone explain why such hardware configuration?
The Intel HD GPU is actually integrated on the CPU die; the discrete graphics adapter usually has higher performance for graphics-intensive applications.
In windows, you should be able to choose which graphics adapter an application uses by right-clicking its shortcut and choosing the "Run with graphics processor" option from the context menu (the default can also be set in the NVIDIA Control Panel, with NVIDIA adapters). So you can have the integrated GPU handling mostly static displays and using less battery, while the dedicated GPU kicks in for AutoCAD, video editing, gaming, et cetera.
On desktop PCs, if the display/s is/are connected to the discrete GPU's output port/s then the discrete GPU is used for everything.
I don't know how to tell which graphics adapter is being used by a particular app in CentOS... the only benchmarking suite I've heard of for CentOS is Phoronix (look in EPEL), which should have the GLMark2 benchmark to test the OpenGL renderers. I'm not aware of any linux flavor that supports Direct3D.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Darr247 wrote:
I don't know how to tell which graphics adapter is being used by a particular app in CentOS... the only benchmarking suite I've heard of for CentOS is Phoronix (look in EPEL), which should have the GLMark2 benchmark to test the OpenGL renderers. I'm not aware of any linux flavor that supports Direct3D.
You want to look into Bumblebee for this hybrid nvidia setup.
https://elrepo.org/tiki/bumblebee
jh
This point can be done. First to verify that the intel gpu is work.
I got old laptops in my office and disable nvidia at first and it works.
Secondary. If the offical NVIDIA kmod version works with the rest of his hardware he can go on with bumblebee. NVIDIA drivers disable nouveau in the same way as I tell him.
Am Freitag, den 04.08.2017, 16:45 +0100 schrieb John Hodrien:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Darr247 wrote:
I don't know how to tell which graphics adapter is being used by a particular app in CentOS... the only benchmarking suite I've heard of for CentOS is Phoronix (look in EPEL), which should have the GLMark2 benchmark to test the OpenGL renderers. I'm not aware of any linux flavor that supports Direct3D.
You want to look into Bumblebee for this hybrid nvidia setup.
https://elrepo.org/tiki/bumblebee
jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:24:08 +0200 Andreas Benzler andreas@benzlerweb.de wrote:
Ok you in Grub press tab and then add „3“ after the initrd entry …. quiet…“
yum remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
And see if X11 come up with standard frambuffer…
Disable nouveau complete from kernel if the upper not helps.
nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf
blacklist nouveau
I yum-removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau, but system will still hang after gfx login.
After I log in, the mouse is shown on the grey wallpaper, and nothing more. If I attempt to switch to a text tty: mouse is gone, same wallpaper, and no more control on mouse or keyboard, this looks like a video/Xorg issue. Xorg.log shows that it loads the Intel module but still looks for the nouveau one:
[ 6.565] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau" [ 6.565] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nouveau [ 6.565] (II) UnloadModule: "nouveau" [ 6.565] (II) Unloading nouveau [ 6.565] (EE) Failed to load module "nouveau" (module does not exist, 0)
Second attempt: blacklisted nouveau kernel module -> nouveau still shows in `lsmod` after reboot (w/ a non-ml kernel), wft? But Xorg.log doesn't mention nouveau anymore, success? No, it still hangs w/ ml kernel.
====
After all this, I wanted to get back to kernel 3.10, to see now that nouveau is off, if that changes something. Well this is a surprise, everything works fine w/ this 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 kernel (suspend/hibernate/wifi/hmdi-out/dell keys/vmware) BUT the bluetooth (and the dell fn+radioswitch key).
I re-installed drv-nouveau, removed the blacklist file from /etc/modprobe.d and all is still OK, but Xorg doesn't loads nouveau driver despite the fact that lsmod shows the nouveau kernel module (I checked, during my former attempts w/ this 3.10 kernels, it was already the case: Xorg not loading drv nouveau).
IOW this whole topics turns into something more complex (call that a mess?) ;-) and I don't understand how it could not work w/ regard to these laptop features and how it works now.
I'm willing to help w/ the experimental or ML 4.x series kernels, but in terms of personal productivity, I will also focus on solving the bluetooth issue w/ 3.10 kernel.
Regards,
Am 04.08.2017 um 12:52 schrieb wwp subscript@free.fr:
Hello,
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 13:53:45 -0500 Lance Lassetter <lancelassetter@gmail.com mailto:lancelassetter@gmail.com> wrote:
On August 2, 2017 3:18:29 AM CDT, wwp subscript@free.fr wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0500 Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 07/28/2017 11:32 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Johnny,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:33:15 -0500 Johnny Hughes
johnny@centos.org wrote:
[snip] >> I've just succeeded in installing CentOS7 from the DVD! Had no
luck
>> using a Live CD (both dd'ed to a flash drive). >> >> Hardware support is not complete (or not configured as-is): >> - bluetooth not working >> - HDMI ouput -> nothing >> - dell Fn keys -> no screen light, no wifi toggle >> - no suspend/hibernate >> >> I will now try to inject more recent kernels (yours *) or extra
firmware,
>> see how I can find better hardware support and configuration. And >> compare this to what Fedora 26 provides.. >> >> (*) BTW, I installed your 4.9.39 kernel (did a yum update after >> configuring a repo file to get your stuff) and at boot, I
immediately
>> get: >> error: $KERNEL_NAME_HERE has invalid signature >> error: you need to load the kernel first >> > > There are actually 2 kernels, one on the live DVD I just posted,
and one
> in the experimental repo. > > Both of those would require NO secure boot turned on, but they
both
> should work fine with UEFI and secure boot off.
I could boot 4.9.39, it brings:
- Dell features like screen light control and wireless toggle key,
- dual screen support using the HDMI port,
and maybe more that I couldn't see, wow!
I am using this experimental kernel on my workstation (lenovo w541).
I
have been using it for quite a long time and have not had any major
issues.
I also use it on my secondary workstation (lenovo h50-55).
In addition to my previous reply:
- suspend works
- hibernate works
This is just great!
But it fails to configure VMWare Workstation 12.5.7 and this is a must for my pro activities on this machine.
The build of vmmon and vmnet kernel modules fail. The 12.5.7 version contain the fixes for known/recent issues related to installing VMWare WS on 4.6/4.9 kernels (API changes) and I couldn't find a tip about how to solve this yet. Probably off-topic here, but I doubt I'll get support from VMWare since it's an experimental kernel on top of CentOS7.
Regards,
What about now that you have it booted and working except for VMWare install the mainline 4.x kernel that is available? Take precautionary steps to make sure that will work, hence, back up any data and, if need be, configs.
Would that work?
It didn't. I tried to boot using kernel-ml-4.12.4-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 but it hangs either before or right after the graphical login. No visual tip, system is not responsive until I shutdown the computer. /var/log/message is full of kernel info about failures in a loop that I cannot interpret, see:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TogaA36LBQ3NgUsUGyVVoQ
Regards,
-- wwp _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
wwp wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:24:08 +0200 Andreas Benzler andreas@benzlerweb.de wrote:
Ok you in Grub press tab and then add „3“ after the initrd entry …. quiet…“
yum remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
And see if X11 come up with standard frambuffer…
Disable nouveau complete from kernel if the upper not helps.
nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf
blacklist nouveau
I yum-removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau, but system will still hang after gfx login.
After I log in, the mouse is shown on the grey wallpaper, and nothing more.
<MVNCH> Suggestion: set it to runlevel 3. After it comes up in text mode, try startx, and see if that tells you more. Also, you won't have to reboot....
Have you looked at /etc/X11? Or tried the nVidia configurator?
mark mark
On August 4, 2017 4:29:17 PM CDT, m.roth@5-cent.us wrote:
wwp wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:24:08 +0200 Andreas Benzler
wrote:
Ok you in Grub press tab and then add „3“ after the initrd entry …. quiet…“
yum remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
And see if X11 come up with standard frambuffer…
Disable nouveau complete from kernel if the upper not helps.
nano /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-nouveau.conf
blacklist nouveau
I yum-removed xorg-x11-drv-nouveau, but system will still hang after gfx login.
After I log in, the mouse is shown on the grey wallpaper, and nothing more.
<MVNCH> Suggestion: set it to runlevel 3. After it comes up in text mode, try startx, and see if that tells you more. Also, you won't have to reboot....
Have you looked at /etc/X11? Or tried the nVidia configurator?
mark mark
Hi,
If VMware is a must the mainline kernel should work if you use bumblebee? You might have to go into runlevel 3, remove all of nouveau, set your default boot to runlevel 3, reboot, install the mainline kernel, then follow the bumblebee wiki to get nvidia working with the mainline kernel. Then startx and check your Xorg log file for errors and if it works hopefully VMware will work. I don't know if this will make a difference but have you tried Oracle's VirtualBox? It might have better support for Linux.
Lance
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Andreas Benzler -
Darr247 -
John Hodrien -
Johnny Hughes -
Kahlil Hodgson -
Lamar Owen -
Lance Lassetter -
Leon Fauster -
Leroy Tennison -
m.roth＠5-cent.us -
Matthew Miller -
Mike McCarthy, W1NR -
Nicolas Kovacs -
Phil Perry -
Rainer Duffner -
Valeri Galtsev -
vychytraly . -
wwp