Hello All,
I would like to know that like other communities why not our Cent OS Community is on Nabble. I think it is better for us if we will be there on.
-- Thanks and Regards, Kapil Singh Kushwah Linux System/Network Administrator Hotwax Media Inc. Indore,(M.P) INDIA
kapil singh wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to know that like other communities why not our Cent OS Community is on Nabble. I think it is better for us if we will be there on.
What would be the advantage for the mailing list being on there? We had the discussion about crossgating mailing lists and forums before, in my opinion you cater a different audience with both. But if you could describe the advantages you see (and if you know of a large mailinglist which is on there and where it works), please tell us.
Cheers,
Ralph <- non-web-forum-guy
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
kapil singh wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to know that like other communities why not our Cent OS Community is on Nabble. I think it is better for us if we will be there on.
What would be the advantage for the mailing list being on there? We had the discussion about crossgating mailing lists and forums before, in my opinion you cater a different audience with both. But if you could describe the advantages you see (and if you know of a large mailinglist which is on there and where it works), please tell us.
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
Cheers,
Ralph
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
or just tell people to use gmane :D
It provides a web interface only. so that, the persons who are not subscribed with mailing list can see our threads easily. there thats why i am suggesting
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.orgwrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
or just tell people to use gmane :D
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:28 +0530, kapil singh wrote:
It provides a web interface only. so that, the persons who are not subscribed with mailing list can see our threads easily. there thats why i am suggesting
You mean like this?
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.general/
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:28 +0530, kapil singh wrote:
It provides a web interface only. so that, the persons who are not subscribed with mailing list can see our threads easily. there thats why i am suggesting
You mean like this?
Or the list's own archive at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/?
Mailman doesn't have a search feature built in, but you can use the form at the top of http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos (link at the bottom of every message...).
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
or just tell people to use gmane :D
Well, I see no harm in doing both ...
We can make it read-only on there >:) - but then it's just another archive.
Cheers,
Ralph
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
or just tell people to use gmane :D
Well, I see no harm in doing both ...
We can make it read-only on there >:) - but then it's just another archive.
yes, please make it read-only from such places.
on 8-28-2008 4:26 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
or just tell people to use gmane :D
Well, I see no harm in doing both ...
We can make it read-only on there >:) - but then it's just another archive.
And maybe another spam entry point!
Isn't the list writable to members only? I can't remember anymore.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
I made a Nabble account for archiving this list. All Bugmenot.com accounts didn't work, so I created a new one.
username: nabble4centos@mailinator.com password: ask in private mail
The following options I didn't enable: - This list accepts only plain-text emails. - Ignore X-No-Archive Header. - Make this archive read-only.
The listmaster should subscribe the address lists+1219922402611-789250@n2.nabble.com that postings show up in archive.
The description I copied and pasted from en.Wikipedia.
regards Sven
Sven wrote:
I made a Nabble account for archiving this list. All Bugmenot.com accounts didn't work, so I created a new one.
Thanks for storming ahead >:\
username: nabble4centos@mailinator.com password: ask in private mail
The following options I didn't enable:
- This list accepts only plain-text emails.
Please enable that.
- Ignore X-No-Archive Header.
This also.
The listmaster should subscribe the address lists+1219922402611-789250@n2.nabble.com that postings show up in archive.
This I don't understand.
Cheers,
Ralph
Sven wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that.
I made a Nabble account for archiving this list. All Bugmenot.com accounts didn't work, so I created a new one.
Oh, and I really like how the user who created this shows up as "CentOS".
Hrmpf.
Ralph
On 8/28/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Oh, and I really like how the user who created this shows up as "CentOS". Hrmpf.
Hi Ralph
Sorry for that. I wished to make a contribution for the CentOS project. I deleted this account
Ralph
Excuse me.
regards Sven
Sven wrote:
On 8/28/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Oh, and I really like how the user who created this shows up as "CentOS". Hrmpf.
Hi Ralph
Sorry for that. I wished to make a contribution for the CentOS project. I deleted this account
I'm fine with that. But we were still discussing that - let's say it was done a bit hastily >:)
I do understand what you did and I probably wouldn't have had a problem with it if you would have let this discussion go on a bit ...
Excuse me.
No problem. It's just that "CentOS" always sounds "Done officially". That's exactly the same reason why we do not allow nicks like "centos" in our main irc channel.
No hard feelings and better coordination next time, please. And: This wasn't personal from my side, sorry if it sounded like this.
Cheers,
Ralph