Actually, here is what shows up in the log, regardless of whether the driver is built-in or loaded as a module:

Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.sysrq = 0 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 sysctl: kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Setting network parameters: succeeded Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up loopback interface: succeeded Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 ifup: Device eth0 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up interface eth0: failed Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 ifup: Device eth1 has different MAC address than expected, ignoring. Feb 5 10:16:15 sparenode1 network: Bringing up interface eth1: failed

It has been suggested that I edit out the HWADDR= contents from the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts file and restart the network.

Any other/further input?

Thanks.

-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:35 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Problem with 2.6.11.4 kernel and e1000 driver

I get the following results when I try to load the 2.6.11.4 kernel with an Intel e1000 driver (the one that comes in the kernel source):

1) If I build it into the kernel, nothing shows up at all.

2) If I build it as a loadable module, I get errors on eth0 and eth1 that the MAC address is different than expected, and it ignores the controller.

What's up with this?

Thanks.

mhr

_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos