Hey All,
What's with this?
google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction
I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug in the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome? | | -- | _ | °v° | /(_)\ | ^ ^ Mark LaPierre | Registered Linux user No #267004 | https://linuxcounter.net/ | **** | _______________________________________________ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos |
On 06/17/2013 07:20 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
This has been expected for quite some time ... see this thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
The good news is, I have a version-28 chromium build that works:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The current version there is 28.0.1500.36 (the version one before the current 28.0.1500.45 that is released now as stable).
I will kick off the latest stable build and update that location when it completes .. likely 4-5 hours.
To get the pdfviewer and flash player, see the first link above.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On 06/17/2013 07:32 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:20 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
This has been expected for quite some time ... see this thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
The good news is, I have a version-28 chromium build that works:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The current version there is 28.0.1500.36 (the version one before the current 28.0.1500.45 that is released now as stable).
I will kick off the latest stable build and update that location when it completes .. likely 4-5 hours.
To get the pdfviewer and flash player, see the first link above.
NOTE: I will build the latest stable version of chromium as long as it will build on the CentOS-6.x glibc/gcc combination. At some point in the future, google may produce code that no longer builds on CentOS-6.x ... if/when that happens, obviously these updates will stop at that time. The current 28 and 29 versions do build on CentOS-6.x.
On 06/17/2013 08:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:32 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:20 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
This has been expected for quite some time ... see this thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
The good news is, I have a version-28 chromium build that works:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The current version there is 28.0.1500.36 (the version one before the current 28.0.1500.45 that is released now as stable).
I will kick off the latest stable build and update that location when it completes .. likely 4-5 hours.
To get the pdfviewer and flash player, see the first link above.
NOTE: I will build the latest stable version of chromium as long as it will build on the CentOS-6.x glibc/gcc combination. At some point in the future, google may produce code that no longer builds on CentOS-6.x ... if/when that happens, obviously these updates will stop at that time. The current 28 and 29 versions do build on CentOS-6.x.
Hey Johnny, thank you for the excellent work. It is no small investment in time and skill to do this work for the CentOS community.
On 06/17/2013 07:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:32 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:20 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
This has been expected for quite some time ... see this thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
The good news is, I have a version-28 chromium build that works:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The current version there is 28.0.1500.36 (the version one before the current 28.0.1500.45 that is released now as stable).
I will kick off the latest stable build and update that location when it completes .. likely 4-5 hours.
To get the pdfviewer and flash player, see the first link above.
NOTE: I will build the latest stable version of chromium as long as it will build on the CentOS-6.x glibc/gcc combination. At some point in the future, google may produce code that no longer builds on CentOS-6.x ... if/when that happens, obviously these updates will stop at that time. The current 28 and 29 versions do build on CentOS-6.x.
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Am 18.06.2013 um 12:28 schrieb Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org:
On 06/17/2013 07:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
NOTE: I will build the latest stable version of chromium as long as it will build on the CentOS-6.x glibc/gcc combination. At some point in the future, google may produce code that no longer builds on CentOS-6.x ... if/when that happens, obviously these updates will stop at that time. The current 28 and 29 versions do build on CentOS-6.x.
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Thank you!!
-- LF
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:28, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Thanks for all you for CentOS and for making this available. Any chance you can add support for the 32-bit version? I'm running CentOS 6 i386 and not x86_64.
Thanks Alfred
On 06/18/2013 03:32 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:28, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Thanks for all you for CentOS and for making this available. Any chance you can add support for the 32-bit version? I'm running CentOS 6 i386 and not x86_64.
I will have to create a VM to do that ... let me see if I can get it to build in one.
On 06/18/2013 03:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:32 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:28, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Thanks for all you for CentOS and for making this available. Any chance you can add support for the 32-bit version? I'm running CentOS 6 i386 and not x86_64.
I will have to create a VM to do that ... let me see if I can get it to build in one.
There is now a 32 bit version of chromium posted ... same instructions ... please test it.
On 06/19/2013 09:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/18/2013 03:32 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:28, Johnny Hughes wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
Thanks for all you for CentOS and for making this available. Any chance you can add support for the 32-bit version? I'm running CentOS 6 i386 and not x86_64.
I will have to create a VM to do that ... let me see if I can get it to build in one.
There is now a 32 bit version of chromium posted ... same instructions ... please test it.
I tried the 64bit version, and while it appears to run fine, I get errors like these
[10072:10072:0619/101751:ERROR:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(144)] Running without the SUID sandbox! See https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxSUIDSandboxDevelopment for more information on developing with the sandbox on. [0619/101803:ERROR:nacl_helper_linux.cc(262)] NaCl helper process running without a sandbox! Most likely you need to configure your SUID sandbox correctly
And selinux seems to complain about nacl_helper_bootstrap...
kernel: type=1400 audit(1371662271.495:75): avc: denied { mmap_zero } for pid=10076 comm="nacl_helper_boo" scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=memprotect
-Thomas
On Jun 19, 2013, at 12:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
There is now a 32 bit version of chromium posted ... same instructions ... please test it.
I was out of the office yesterday so I couldn't test it until now. It installs and runs fine for me, but I go get the same warning that was previously reported:
[13520:13520:0620/100425:ERROR:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(144)] Running without the SUID sandbox! See https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxSUIDSandboxDevelopment for more information on developing with the sandbox on. libprotobuf ERROR third_party/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/message_lite.cc:123] Can't parse message of type "in_memory_url_index.InMemoryURLIndexCacheItem" because it is missing required fields: (cannot determine missing fields for lite message)
Thanks for making this available so quickly after my request, Johnny. This will be much appreciated by our user base.
Alfred
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
:) A big thank you for this build.
If I may, how difficult is to enable sandbox? As far as I can tell, it's the only Chrome feature that would be useful to me.
On 06/19/2013 09:01 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
:) A big thank you for this build.
If I may, how difficult is to enable sandbox? As far as I can tell, it's the only Chrome feature that would be useful to me.
I am looking into it (sandbox), but I have not got it working yet.
New stable chromium-28.0.1500.52 released (latest linux stable).
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:58:24PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/19/2013 09:01 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
:) A big thank you for this build.
If I may, how difficult is to enable sandbox? As far as I can tell, it's the only Chrome feature that would be useful to me.
I am looking into it (sandbox), but I have not got it working yet.
New stable chromium-28.0.1500.52 released (latest linux stable).
I was looking into the sandbox earlier today, and I found one page on google, which while referring to chrome indicated that on systems witgh selinux (and specifically mentioned Red Hat) the sandbox isn't used. but that's not what I understood from other places I was reading, so who knows what's the reality?
On 06/18/2013 05:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:32 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:20 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Say hello to unsupported chrome on CentOS
----- Original Message ----- | Hey All, | | What's with this? | | google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.i386 requires | libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15) : Success - empty transaction | | I got a software update notice that offered google-chrome, but when I | tried to install the update I got a dependency issue. Is this a bug | in | the package or is it time to give up on Chrome?
This has been expected for quite some time ... see this thread:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
The good news is, I have a version-28 chromium build that works:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The current version there is 28.0.1500.36 (the version one before the current 28.0.1500.45 that is released now as stable).
I will kick off the latest stable build and update that location when it completes .. likely 4-5 hours.
To get the pdfviewer and flash player, see the first link above.
NOTE: I will build the latest stable version of chromium as long as it will build on the CentOS-6.x glibc/gcc combination. At some point in the future, google may produce code that no longer builds on CentOS-6.x ... if/when that happens, obviously these updates will stop at that time. The current 28 and 29 versions do build on CentOS-6.x.
OK, the latest stable version of Chromium is now posted here:
There is a problem with the standard Chrome PDFViewer, in that it also requires a newer glibc (same problem as the original chrome). So the chrome_libpdf_copy.sh script no longer works.
However, there is a Google Chrome extension named "Docs PDF/PowerPoint Viewer (by Google)" available that will work fine if you disable (or do not install) the libpdf.so file.
You can download/install the extension from here (using chromium):
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/docs-pdfpowerpoint-viewer/nnbmlagg...
Then go to "Settings => Extensions" in chromium and make sure the "PDF Viewer" is disabled and that "Docs PDF/PowerPoint Viewer (by Google)" is enabled.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
-
Alfred von Campe -
Fred Smith -
James A. Peltier -
Johnny Hughes -
Kwan Lowe -
Leon Fauster -
Mark LaPierre -
Thomas Eriksson