At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
Thanks, Glenn
On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
I think that 'digikam' was the intention. I'm not able to get to my centos box at the moment to check, but digikam is included in most distros.
Anne
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Anne Wilson cannewilson@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2008 19:26:20 Glenn wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
I think that 'digikam' was the intention. I'm not able to get to my centos box at the moment to check, but digikam is included in most distros.
I've been using digikam from the kbs-Testing repository. http://centos.karan.org/
Akemi
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn centos@1bigadmin.biz wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.)
www.digikam.org
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski mhsemcheski@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn centos@1bigadmin.biz wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.)
www.digikam.org
Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs. So, I just removed kino and Cinelerra looks like it has a learning curve and no online help. I will look into Digikam. Lanny
Am 02.11.2008 um 20:57 schrieb Lanny Marcus:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Michael Semcheski mhsemcheski@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Glenn centos@1bigadmin.biz wrote:
At 02:57 PM 10/31/2008, you wrote:
I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc.
Its part image database and part image manipulator.
Link? Please? Digicam gives too many hits on search engine even with refining the search. (Lurking and inquisitive)
Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.)
www.digikam.org
Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs.
I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder. He hates it;-) Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these DVDs....
Rainer
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Rainer Duffner rainer@ultra-secure.de wrote: <snip>
Sorry, I did mean Digikam. As you might imply from the k substituting for the c, its a KDE application (although it works fine in a gnome environment.)
www.digikam.org
Michael: Thank you. I will look into Digikam. At first, I thought (assumed) the camcorder we were going to get was MiniDV, but, it uses mini DVDs.
I have a co-worker who also has such a camcorder. He hates it;-) Because to edit these films, you've basically got to re-rip these DVDs....
I hope our luck with the mini DVD camcorder will be better!
-
Akemi Yagi -
Anne Wilson -
Glenn -
Lanny Marcus -
Michael Semcheski -
Rainer Duffner