--- On Tue, 6/2/09, Dag Wieers dag@centos.org wrote:
Communication problems are usually caused by both sides.
Agreed.
Besides the EUS source RPM packages are not released to the public, so you need those expensive entitlements to be able to rebuild them.
Eek. Never knew that. This looks more like SLES/SLED than like RHEL :-/
So it seems a fair decision.
I wasn't questioning CentOS's decision!
So nothing is contradicting, you just have old information and new information.
Thank you very much!
Now that things are clarified... why is audacious broken in RPMforge? "Missing Dependency: audacious-plugins >= 1.3.0 is needed by package audacious-1.3.2-5.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)"
Regards, R-C
__________________________________________________________________ Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
on 6-2-2009 1:53 PM Radu-Cristian FOTESCU spake the following:
--- On Tue, 6/2/09, Dag Wieers dag-IFYaIzF+flcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org wrote:
Communication problems are usually caused by both sides.
Agreed.
Besides the EUS source RPM packages are not released to the public, so you need those expensive entitlements to be able to rebuild them.
Eek. Never knew that. This looks more like SLES/SLED than like RHEL :-/
So it seems a fair decision.
I wasn't questioning CentOS's decision!
So nothing is contradicting, you just have old information and new information.
Thank you very much!
Now that things are clarified... why is audacious broken in RPMforge? "Missing Dependency: audacious-plugins >= 1.3.0 is needed by package audacious-1.3.2-5.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)"
Maybe this question is best asked on the rpmforge list, a separate entity from CentOS.