I am trying to bring in a fedora 13 rpm, when compiliny objcopy is given a target of efi-app-x86_64, when I do a objcopy --info it is not listed.
It does list many elf (including 64 bit) and efi-app-ia32 bit
Any suggestions, what additional information could I provide.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:05 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
I am trying to bring in a fedora 13 rpm, when compiliny objcopy is given a target of efi-app-x86_64, when I do a objcopy --info it is not listed.
It does list many elf (including 64 bit) and efi-app-ia32 bit
Any suggestions, what additional information could I provide.
Trying to compile binutil from fedora 13... It is supposed to address this with a higher version
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:14 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:05 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
I am trying to bring in a fedora 13 rpm, when compiliny objcopy is given a target of efi-app-x86_64, when I do a objcopy --info it is not listed.
It does list many elf (including 64 bit) and efi-app-ia32 bit
Any suggestions, what additional information could I provide.
Trying to compile binutil from fedora 13... It is supposed to address this with a higher version
--- You will find out that some things are hit or miss. Then at times you will break the build machine with the newer binutils. Fedora rpms do not always work or build for RH/CentOS.
John
Why not give the exact error from the build out put.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of JohnS Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:24 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:14 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:05 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
I am trying to bring in a fedora 13 rpm, when compiliny
objcopy is
given a target of efi-app-x86_64, when I do a objcopy
--info it is
not listed.
It does list many elf (including 64 bit) and efi-app-ia32 bit
Any suggestions, what additional information could I provide.
Trying to compile binutil from fedora 13... It is supposed
to address
this with a higher version
You will find out that some things are hit or miss. Then at times you will break the build machine with the newer binutils. Fedora rpms do not always work or build for RH/CentOS.
I got binutils and gnu-efi to compile now. They are a necessary evil at the moment, as the end goal is to compile grub (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204)
Why not give the exact error from the build out put.
(there is an air gap separating the system from the world of email)
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:30 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
You will find out that some things are hit or miss. Then at times you will break the build machine with the newer binutils. Fedora rpms do not always work or build for RH/CentOS.
I got binutils and gnu-efi to compile now. They are a necessary evil at the moment, as the end goal is to compile grub (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204)
OK You try the GRAPHICAL=NO option ? Currious I have few people on those desktops.
Why not give the exact error from the build out put.
(there is an air gap separating the system from the world of email)
A simple copy and paste from the console or mock logs.
John
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of JohnS Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:59 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] efi-app-x86_64 on 5.5?
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 10:30 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
You will find out that some things are hit or miss. Then
at times
you will break the build machine with the newer binutils. Fedora rpms do not always work or build for RH/CentOS.
I got binutils and gnu-efi to compile now. They are a
necessary evil
at the moment, as the end goal is to compile grub (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204)
OK You try the GRAPHICAL=NO option ? Currious I have few people on those desktops.
/etc/sysconfig/init: GRAPHICAL=no /boot/grub/grub.conf: vga=normal /boot/grub/grub.conf: #splash...
No luck. Going back to compiling grub (configure issue with ncurses/termcap and -ltinfo [there is no libtinfo.a on the filesystem])
Why not give the exact error from the build out put.
(there is an air gap separating the system from the world of email)
A simple copy and paste from the console or mock logs.
I work in a secure environment, there are no documents (sticky notes, etc) or signals (including emails) alowed to leave the room. I remember the issue, go to another workstation, do a search / write an email.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:15 -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
I got binutils and gnu-efi to compile now. They are a
necessary evil
at the moment, as the end goal is to compile grub (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204)
OK You try the GRAPHICAL=NO option ? Currious I have few people on those desktops.
/etc/sysconfig/init: GRAPHICAL=no /boot/grub/grub.conf: vga=normal /boot/grub/grub.conf: #splash...
No luck. Going back to compiling grub (configure issue with ncurses/termcap and -ltinfo [there is no libtinfo.a on the filesystem])
Why not give the exact error from the build out put.
(there is an air gap separating the system from the world of email)
A simple copy and paste from the console or mock logs.
I work in a secure environment, there are no documents (sticky notes, etc) or signals (including emails) alowed to leave the room. I remember the issue, go to another workstation, do a search / write an email.
--- Ahh, yes Axolotl security...They say owls stop whooting when you turn a chair upside down also.
John
-
Jason Pyeron -
JohnS